Literature DB >> 16712987

Insurer-provider integration, credible commitment, and managed-care backlash.

Nolan H Miller1.   

Abstract

People distrust managed care organizations (MCOs) more than traditional health plans. This phenomenon has become known as "managed-care backlash." Using a model of the interaction between insurers, physicians, and patients, this paper identifies two possible motivations for MCO backlash. The first, which comes from traditional health plans' superior ability to credibly commit to providing better than least-cost care, is efficiency promoting. The second, which arises when patients are able to obtain higher-benefit treatments through reneging on their initial insurance contracts through "doctor shopping," may reduce efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16712987     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  3 in total

1.  Which preferred providers are really preferred? Effectiveness of insurers' channeling incentives on pharmacy choice.

Authors:  Lieke H H M Boonen; Frederik T Schut; Bas Donkers; Xander Koolman
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2009-02-26

2.  Channeling consumers to preferred providers and the impact of status quo bias: does type of provider matter?

Authors:  Lieke H H M Boonen; Bas Donkers; Frederik T Schut
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Acceptance of selective contracting: the role of trust in the health insurer.

Authors:  Romy E Bes; Sonja Wendel; Emile C Curfs; Peter P Groenewegen; Judith D de Jong
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.