Literature DB >> 16712936

From neurotoxic to chemosensory effects: new insights on acute solvent neurotoxicity exemplified by acute effects of 2-ethylhexanol.

Christoph van Thriel1, Ernst Kiesswetter, Michael Schäper, Meinolf Blaszkewicz, Klaus Golka, Stephanie Juran, Stefan Kleinbeck, Andreas Seeber.   

Abstract

Historically, acute solvent neurotoxicity was strongly related to reversible narcotic states that could be detected by neurobehavioral tests (e.g., simple reaction time). Nowadays, the occupational exposure to chemicals is markedly reduced and the avoidance of chemosensory effects is more important for the regulation of solvents. Exemplarily, this study examines if the chemosensory perception of 2-ethylhexanol is capable to distract performance in demanding neurobehavioral tasks. In two experiments three time-weighted average concentrations of 2-ethylhexanol (C(TWA): 1.5, 10, and 20 ppm) were investigated. In experiment A (n=24) variable concentrations over time (4h) were used, experiment B (n=22) investigated constant concentrations. The experiments were conducted in a 29 m3 exposure laboratory. Cross-over designs with randomized sequences of exposures were used. Among the 46 male participants 19 subjects reported enhanced chemical sensitivity; the other 27 subjects did not show this personality feature. During the exposure periods neurobehavioral tests were presented twice (beginning; end), the intensity of chemosensory perceptions were rated thrice. The intensity of chemosensory perceptions showed a clear dose-dependency. Subjects' performance in the vigilance test was not affected by the different exposures. Moreover, the results of neurobehavioral tests measuring executive function were neither affected by the C(TWA) concentration nor by the exposure peaks. With increasing C(TWA), a subgroup of the chemically sensitive subjects showed deteriorated accuracy in a divided attention task. Especially the 20 ppm conditions were very annoying. Only during the constant 10 ppm condition the time courses of the annoyance and nasal irritation ratings indicated some adaptation. In general, with the applied neurobehavioral tests distractive effects of acute 2-ethylhexanol exposures up to 20 ppm could not be confirmed. In sensitive groups such distractive effects of irritating solvents might be conceivable and moreover, in cooperation with researchers from cognitive neuroscience more sensitive functions and tests should be developed and incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16712936     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotoxicology        ISSN: 0161-813X            Impact factor:   4.294


  11 in total

1.  Symptom screening in detection of occupational solvent-related encephalopathy.

Authors:  Ari Kaukiainen; Ritva Akila; Rami Martikainen; Markku Sainio
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Cyclohexane produces behavioral deficits associated with astrogliosis and microglial reactivity in the adult hippocampus mouse brain.

Authors:  Tania Campos-Ordonez; David Zarate-Lopez; Alma Y Galvez-Contreras; Norma Moy-Lopez; Jorge Guzman-Muniz; Oscar Gonzalez-Perez
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  Multidimensional assessment of self-reported chemical intolerance and its impact on chemosensory effects during ammonia exposure.

Authors:  Marlene Pacharra; Stefan Kleinbeck; Michael Schäper; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  Neurobehavioral testing in human risk assessment.

Authors:  Diane S Rohlman; Roberto Lucchini; W Kent Anger; David C Bellinger; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 5.  Sensory irritation as a basis for setting occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  Thomas Brüning; Rüdiger Bartsch; Hermann Maximillian Bolt; Herbert Desel; Hans Drexler; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Andrea Hartwig; Rudolf Jäckh; Edgar Leibold; Dirk Pallapies; Albert W Rettenmeier; Gerhard Schlüter; Gisela Stropp; Kirsten Sucker; Gerhard Triebig; Götz Westphal; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Occupational Exposure Limits of lead, dimethylamine, n-butyl-2,3-epoxypropyl ether, and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol and carcinogenicity and occupational sensitizer classification.

Authors:  Kenichi Azuma; Ginji Endo; Yoko Endo; Kunio Hara; Koji Harada; Hajime Hori; Seichi Horie; Hyogo Horiguchi; Masayoshi Ichiba; Gaku Ichihara; Masayuki Ikeda; Tatsuya Ishitake; Akiyoshi Ito; Satoko Iwasawa; Michihiro Kamijima; Kanae Karita; Toshio Kawai; Toshihiro Kawamoto; Akio Koizumi; Shinji Kumagai; Yukinori Kusaka; Muneyuki Miyagawa; Yasuo Morimoto; Kasuke Nagano; Tamie Nasu; Tetsuo Nomiyama; Kazuyuki Omae; Kazuhiro Sato; Hirokazu Okuda; Haruhiko Sakurai; Tomotaka Sobue; Yasushi Suwazono; Toru Takebayashi; Tatsuya Takeshita; Akito Takeuchi; Masatoshi Tanaka; Shigeru Tanaka; Teruomi Tsukahara; Masashi Tsunoda; Susumu Ueno; Yuko Yamano; Takenori Yamauchi; Eiji Yano
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 7.  Comprehensive review of 2-ethyl-1-hexanol as an indoor air pollutant.

Authors:  Takanari Wakayama; Yuki Ito; Kiyoshi Sakai; Mio Miyake; Eiji Shibata; Hiroyuki Ohno; Michihiro Kamijima
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Ocular surface and tear film changes in workers exposed to organic solvents used in the dry-cleaning industry.

Authors:  Ingrid Astrid Jiménez Barbosa; Martha Fabiola Rodríguez Alvarez; Gerardo Andrés Dussán Torres; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Glial plasticity after hexahydrobenzene exposure.

Authors:  Tania Campos-Ordonez; Oscar Gonzalez-Perez
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  A short-term inhalation study to assess the reversibility of sensory irritation in human volunteers.

Authors:  Stefan Kleinbeck; Michael Schäper; Marlene Pacharra; Marie Louise Lehmann; Klaus Golka; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Thomas Brüning; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.