Literature DB >> 16711765

Assessing the discriminatory power of scoring functions for virtual screening.

Markus H J Seifert1.   

Abstract

The efficiency of scoring functions for hit identification is usually quantified in terms of enrichment factors and enrichment curves. Close inspection of simulated and real score distributions from virtual screening, however, suggests that 'analysis of variance' (ANOVA) is a more reliable method for assessing their performance. Using ANOVA to quantify the discriminatory power of scoring functions with respect to ligands, decoys, and a reproducible reference database has the potential to facilitate the advancement of scoring functions significantly.

Year:  2006        PMID: 16711765     DOI: 10.1021/ci060027n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  4 in total

1.  A CROC stronger than ROC: measuring, visualizing and optimizing early retrieval.

Authors:  S Joshua Swamidass; Chloé-Agathe Azencott; Kenny Daily; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Multiple protein structures and multiple ligands: effects on the apparent goodness of virtual screening results.

Authors:  Robert P Sheridan; Georgia B McGaughey; Wendy D Cornell
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  How to do an evaluation: pitfalls and traps.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; Gregory L Warren; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Discovery of novel, non-acidic mPGES-1 inhibitors by virtual screening with a multistep protocol.

Authors:  Stefan M Noha; Katrin Fischer; Andreas Koeberle; Ulrike Garscha; Oliver Werz; Daniela Schuster
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.641

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.