Literature DB >> 16711059

Density-dependent habitat selection and performance by a large mobile reef fish.

William J Lindberg1, Thomas K Frazer, Kenneth M Portier, Frederic Vose, James Loftin, Debra J Murie, Doran M Mason, Brian Nagy, Mary K Hart.   

Abstract

Many exploited reef fish are vulnerable to overfishing because they concentrate over hard-bottom patchy habitats. How mobile reef fish use patchy habitat, and the potential consequences on demographic parameters, must be known for spatially explicit population dynamics modeling, for discriminating essential fish habitat (EFH), and for effectively planning conservation measures (e.g., marine protected areas, stock enhancement, and artificial reefs). Gag, Mycteroperca microlepis, is an ecologically and economically important warm-temperate grouper in the southeastern United States, with behavioral and life history traits conducive to large-scale field experiments. The Suwannee Regional Reef System (SRRS) was built of standard habitat units (SHUs) in 1991-1993 to manipulate and control habitat patchiness and intrinsic habitat quality, and thereby test predictions from habitat selection theory. Colonization of the SRRS by gag over the first six years showed significant interactions of SHU size, spacing, and reef age; with trajectories modeled using a quadratic function for closely spaced SHUs (25 m) and a linear model for widely spaced SHUs (225 m), with larger SHUs (16 standardized cubes) accumulating significantly more gag faster than smaller 4-cube SHUs (mean = 72.5 gag/16-cube SHU at 225-m spacing by year 6, compared to 24.2 gag/4-cube SHU for same spacing and reef age). Residency times (mean = 9.8 mo), indicative of choice and measured by ultrasonic telemetry (1995-1998), showed significant interaction of SHU size and spacing consistent with colonization trajectories. Average relative weight (W(r)) and incremental growth were greater on smaller than larger SHUs (mean W(r) = 104.2 vs. 97.7; incremental growth differed by 15%), contrary to patterns of abundance and residency. Experimental manipulation of shelter on a subset of SRRS sites (2000-2001) confirmed our hypothesis that shelter limits local densities of gag, which, in turn, regulates their growth and condition. Density-dependent habitat selection for shelter and individual growth dynamics were therefore interdependent ecological processes that help to explain how patchy reef habitat sustains gag production. Moreover, gag selected shelter at the expense of maximizing their growth. Thus, mobile reef fishes could experience density-dependent effects on growth, survival, and/or reproduction (i.e., demographic parameters) despite reduced stock sizes as a consequence of fishing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16711059     DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0731:dhsapb]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  7 in total

1.  Environmental factors affecting large-bodied coral reef fish assemblages in the Mariana Archipelago.

Authors:  Benjamin L Richards; Ivor D Williams; Oliver J Vetter; Gareth J Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Using Fish Population Metrics to Compare the Effects of Artificial Reef Density.

Authors:  Catheline Y M Froehlich; Richard J Kline
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  From shelf to shelf: assessing historical and contemporary genetic differentiation and connectivity across the Gulf of Mexico in Gag, Mycteroperca microlepis.

Authors:  Nathaniel K Jue; Thierry Brulé; Felicia C Coleman; Christopher C Koenig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Site-dependent regulation of breeding success: Evidence for the buffer effect in the common guillemot, a colonially breeding seabird.

Authors:  Sophie Bennett; Sarah Wanless; Michael P Harris; Mark A Newell; Kate Searle; Jonathan A Green; Francis Daunt
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  An ecohydraulic model to identify and monitor Moapa dace habitat.

Authors:  James R Hatten; Thomas R Batt; Gary G Scoppettone; Christopher J Dixon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fish assemblages on estuarine artificial reefs: natural rocky-reef mimics or discrete assemblages?

Authors:  Heath Folpp; Michael Lowry; Marcus Gregson; Iain M Suthers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spatial and Dietary Overlap Creates Potential for Competition between Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) and Vermilion snapper (Rhomboplites aurorubens).

Authors:  William T Davis; J Marcus Drymon; Sean P Powers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.