Literature DB >> 16711044

Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: effects of landscaping in Colorado's front range.

Nancy E Golubiewski1.   

Abstract

During the past few decades, urban and suburban developments have grown at unprecedented rates and extents with unknown consequences for ecosystem function. Carbon pools of soil and vegetation on landscaped properties were examined in the Front Range of Colorado, USA, in order to characterize vegetation and soils found in urban green spaces; analyze their aboveground biomass, vegetative C storage, and soil C storage; and compare these suburban ecosystem properties to their counterparts in native grassland and cultivated fields. Anthropogenic activities leave clear signatures on all three C compartments measured. Management level dominates the response of grass production, biomass, and N tissue concentration. This, in turn, influences the amount of C and N both stored in and harvested from sites. The site age dominates the amount of woody biomass as well as soil C and N. Soil texture only secondarily affects total soil carbon and total bulk density. Established urban green spaces harbor larger C pools, more than double in some cases, than native grasslands or agricultural fields on a per-area basis. Lawn grass produces more biomass and stores more C than local prairie or agricultural fields. Introduced woody vegetation comprises a substantial C pool in urban green spaces and represents a new ecosystem feature. After an initial decrease with site development, soil organic carbon (SOC) pools surpass those in grasslands within two decades. In addition to the marked increase of C pools through time, a shift in storage from belowground to aboveground occurs. Whereas grasslands store approximately 90% of C belowground, urban green spaces store a decreasing proportion of the total C belowground in soils through time, reaching approximately 70% 30-40 years after construction. Despite the substantial increase in C pools in this urban area, it is important to recognize that this shift is distinct from C sequestration since it does not account for a total C budget, including increased anthropogenic C emissions from these sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16711044     DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0555:uigcpe]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  10 in total

1.  A comparison of three empirically based, spatially explicit predictive models of residential soil Pb concentrations in Baltimore, Maryland, USA: understanding the variability within cities.

Authors:  Kirsten Schwarz; Kathleen C Weathers; Steward T A Pickett; Richard G Lathrop; Richard V Pouyat; Mary L Cadenasso
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Prevalent vegetation growth enhancement in urban environment.

Authors:  Shuqing Zhao; Shuguang Liu; Decheng Zhou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of climate and soil properties on U.S. home lawn soil organic carbon concentration and pool.

Authors:  Adam Selhorst; Rattan Lal
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Plant nitrogen concentration and isotopic composition in residential lawns across seven US cities.

Authors:  T L E Trammell; D E Pataki; J Cavender-Bares; P M Groffman; S J Hall; J B Heffernan; S E Hobbie; J L Morse; C Neill; K C Nelson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Temporal consistency between gross primary production and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in the ten most populous megacity areas over years.

Authors:  Yaoping Cui; Xiangming Xiao; Yao Zhang; Jinwei Dong; Yuanwei Qin; Russell B Doughty; Geli Zhang; Jie Wang; Xiaocui Wu; Yaochen Qin; Shenghui Zhou; Joanna Joiner; Berrien Moore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries.

Authors:  Morgan E Peach; Laura A Ogden; Eleni A Mora; Andrew J Friedland
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2019-08-16

Review 7.  Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass-Soil Systems.

Authors:  Ruying Wang; Clint M Mattox; Claire L Phillips; Alec R Kowalewski
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-22

8.  Organic carbon storage in four ecosystem types in the karst region of southwestern China.

Authors:  Yuguo Liu; Changcheng Liu; Shijie Wang; Ke Guo; Jun Yang; Xinshi Zhang; Guoqing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tree Productivity Enhanced with Conversion from Forest to Urban Land Covers.

Authors:  Brittain M Briber; Lucy R Hutyra; Andrew B Reinmann; Steve M Raciti; Victoria K Dearborn; Christopher E Holden; Allison L Dunn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ecosystem functioning in urban grasslands: The role of biodiversity, plant invasions and urbanization.

Authors:  Gabriela Onandia; Conrad Schittko; Masahiro Ryo; Maud Bernard-Verdier; Tina Heger; Jasmin Joshi; Ingo Kowarik; Arthur Gessler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.