Literature DB >> 16710961

Potential for zoonotic transmission of Brachyspira pilosicoli.

David J Hampson, Sophy L Oxberry, Tom La.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16710961      PMCID: PMC3374423          DOI: 10.3201/eid1205.051180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Anaerobic intestinal spirochetes of the genus Brachyspira colonize the large intestine (). Most Brachyspira species have a restricted host range, whereas Brachyspira (formerly Serpulina) pilosicoli colonizes a variety of animal and bird species and humans. B. pilosicoli is an important colonic pathogen of pigs and chickens (). It occurs at high prevalence rates in humans in developing countries and in male homosexuals and HIV-positive persons in industrialized countries (). Its potential as a human pathogen was emphasized after its identification in the bloodstream of a series of debilitated persons (). B. pilosicoli isolates from humans and other species have been used experimentally to colonize chicks, piglets, and mice (–). While these results indicate that the B. pilosicoli strains used lacked host-species specificity, few data exist on whether natural zoonotic spread of B. pilosicoli strains occurs. In 1 study that used pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to type isolates from Papua New Guinea, 2 dogs were colonized with B. pilosicoli isolates with the same PFGE types as those from villagers. However, the higher prevalence of colonization with B. pilosicoli in humans than dogs suggested that the dogs were infected with human isolates, probably through consumption of human feces (). Multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) has been used to study variation in B. pilosicoli isolates; most studies have focused on isolates from only 1 or 2 host species (–). Generally, B. pilosicoli isolates are diverse, and a lack of linkage disequilibrium in the MLEE data for human isolates suggests that the species is recombinant (). We used MLEE to investigate relationships between 107 B. pilosicoli isolates of diverse geographic and host-species origins and the B. aalborgi type strain (NCTC 11492T). Isolates were selected on the basis of their diverse origins and availability in the Murdoch University culture collection. They originated from feces of 34 pigs, 19 chickens, 13 ducks, 1 rhea, 25 humans, and 4 dogs; from 7 human blood samples; and from 4 water sources frequented by waterfowl. Isolates originated from Australia, Canada, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Oman, Papua New Guinea, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The MLEE method used was as previously described (–); the electrophoretic mobility of 15 constitutive enzymes was analyzed. Variations in electrophoretic mobility were interpreted as representing products of different alleles at each enzyme locus. Isolates with identical enzymatic profiles at 15 loci were grouped into an electrophoretic type (ET). Genetic distance between ETs was calculated as the proportions of loci at which dissimilar alleles occurred. PHYLIP version 3.51c (Phylogeny Inference Package, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA) was used to analyze data and generate a dendrogram by using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean clustering fusion strategy. Genetic diversity (h) was calculated for the number of ETs as (1 – Σpi2)(n/n – 1), where pi is the frequency of the indicated allele and n is the number of ETs. B. pilosicoli isolates were divided into 80 ETs (mean 1.35 isolates per ET) (Figure). B. aalborgi NTCC 11492T was distinct in ET81. The B. pilosicoli isolates were diverse, with an h value of 0.41. Generally, they did not cluster according to host species of origin, and isolates from a given species were distributed throughout the dendrogram. Isolates from birds were more diverse than those from humans and pigs. Eight ETs contained multiple isolates, in each case from the same host species (either chickens or pigs). In 4 cases these originated from different countries: ET47 contained 2 Australian porcine isolates and 2 from the United States; ET53 contained 2 Australian porcine isolates and Scottish porcine type strain P43/6/78T; ET54 contained 2 Australian and 2 Canadian porcine isolates; ET65 contained 1 Dutch and 1 US chicken isolate.
Figure

Dendrogram showing relationships between 107 isolates of Brachyspira pilosicoli originating from various host species located in electrophoretic types (ETs) 1-80 and B. aalborgi NCTC 11492T located in ET81.

Dendrogram showing relationships between 107 isolates of Brachyspira pilosicoli originating from various host species located in electrophoretic types (ETs) 1-80 and B. aalborgi NCTC 11492T located in ET81. Although human isolates did not share an ET with isolates from other species, they were frequently closely related, differing in 1 allele. This occurred with US and Australian pig isolates in ET47 and a human isolate from Oman in ET48; an Australian pig isolate in ET61 and a UK human isolate in ET62; an isolate from an Australian HIV-positive person in ET64, and 1 Dutch and 1 US chicken isolate in ET65; and a Papua New Guinea canine isolate in ET68 and a French human blood isolate in ET69. The distribution continuum of isolates of diverse host species and geographic origin was consistent with a lack of species specificity and suggests that B. pilosicoli isolates naturally have the potential to be transmitted between species. Even should there be some unexpected species-specific barrier preventing "true" animal or bird isolates from colonizing humans, animals have been colonized by human isolates, and thus could act as a reservoir of these for subsequent retransmission to humans. The results suggest that zoonotic transfer of B. pilosicoli isolates likely occurs in nature, e.g., after exposure to infected animals or birds, their feces, or contaminated water.
  7 in total

1.  Pathogenicity of human and porcine intestinal spirochetes in one-day-old specific-pathogen-free chicks: an animal model of intestinal spirochetosis.

Authors:  D J Trott; A J McLaren; D J Hampson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Experimental infection of newly weaned pigs with human and porcine strains of Serpulina pilosicoli.

Authors:  D J Trott; C R Huxtable; D J Hampson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  The porcine intestinal spirochaetes: identification of new genetic groups.

Authors:  J I Lee; D J Hampson; A J Lymbery; S J Harders
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Population genetic analysis of Serpulina pilosicoli and its molecular epidemiology in villages in the eastern Highlands of Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  D J Trott; A S Mikosza; B G Combs; S L Oxberry; D J Hampson
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1998-07

5.  Identification and characterization of Serpulina pilosicoli isolates recovered from the blood of critically ill patients.

Authors:  D J Trott; N S Jensen; I Saint Girons; S L Oxberry; T B Stanton; D Lindquist; D J Hampson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Genetic and phenotypic characterization of intestinal spirochetes colonizing chickens and allocation of known pathogenic isolates to three distinct genetic groups.

Authors:  A J McLaren; D J Trott; D E Swayne; S L Oxberry; D J Hampson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Experimental infection of C3H mice with avian, porcine, or human isolates of Serpulina pilosicoli.

Authors:  R E Sacco; D W Trampel; M J Wannemuehler
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.441

  7 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  The Spirochete Brachyspira pilosicoli, Enteric Pathogen of Animals and Humans.

Authors:  David J Hampson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Antimicrobial therapy of selected diseases in turkeys, laying hens, and minor poultry species in Canada.

Authors:  Agnes Agunos; Carolee Carson; Dave Léger
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  The intestinal spirochete Brachyspira pilosicoli attaches to cultured Caco-2 cells and induces pathological changes.

Authors:  Ram Naresh; Yong Song; David J Hampson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Current and past strategies for bacterial culture in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Lagier; Sophie Edouard; Isabelle Pagnier; Oleg Mediannikov; Michel Drancourt; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  A two-year prospective study of small poultry flocks in Ontario, Canada, part 1: prevalence of viral and bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Nancy M Brochu; Michele T Guerin; Csaba Varga; Brandon N Lillie; Marina L Brash; Leonardo Susta
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.279

6.  The complete genome sequence of the pathogenic intestinal spirochete Brachyspira pilosicoli and comparison with other Brachyspira genomes.

Authors:  Phatthanaphong Wanchanthuek; Matthew I Bellgard; Tom La; Karon Ryan; Paula Moolhuijzen; Brett Chapman; Michael Black; David Schibeci; Adam Hunter; Roberto Barrero; Nyree D Phillips; David J Hampson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spirochaetes as intestinal pathogens: lessons from a Brachyspira genome.

Authors:  David J Hampson; Niyaz Ahmed
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.181

8.  Evidence of homologous recombination as a driver of diversity in Brachyspira pilosicoli.

Authors:  Anish Pandey; Maria Victoria Humbert; Alexandra Jackson; Jade L Passey; David J Hampson; David W Cleary; Roberto M La Ragione; Myron Christodoulides
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2020-11-11

Review 9.  Intestinal spirochetosis mimicking inflammatory bowel disease in children.

Authors:  Rossana Helbling; Maria-Chiara Osterheld; Bernard Vaudaux; Katia Jaton; Andreas Nydegger
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Comparative genomics of Brachyspira pilosicoli strains: genome rearrangements, reductions and correlation of genetic compliment with phenotypic diversity.

Authors:  Luke J Mappley; Michael L Black; Manal AbuOun; Alistair C Darby; Martin J Woodward; Julian Parkhill; A Keith Turner; Matthew I Bellgard; Tom La; Nyree D Phillips; Roberto M La Ragione; David J Hampson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.