Literature DB >> 16710708

Comparison of dose conversion factors for radon progeny from the ICRP 66 regional model and an airway tube model of tracheo-bronchial tree.

D Nikezic1, B M F Lau, K N Yu.   

Abstract

Current epidemiological approaches to radon dosimetry yield a dose conversion factor (DCF) of 4 mSv WLM(-1) while the dosimetric approaches give a value closer to 13 mSv WLM(-1). The present study investigated whether the application of compartment models for the bronchial (BB) and bronchiolar (bb) regions, rather than more anatomically realistic airway tube models, has brought the dosimetric DCF to the higher values. The airway tube model of the tracheo-bronchial tree was used to calculate the effective dose per unit radon exposure. All other elements of the human respiratory tract from the reports of the ICRP or NRC were adopted. A dosimetric derivation of the radon DCF using the airway tube model yielded a value of 14.2 mSv WLM(-1). This value is slightly larger than, but not significantly different from, the result obtained through the ICRP 66 approach. It is concluded that utilization of the airway tube model instead of the regional ICRP 66 compartmental model cannot reconcile the gap between dose conversion factors derived from epidemiological and dosimetric approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16710708     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-006-0048-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  6 in total

1.  Absorbed dose delivered by alpha particles calculated in cylindrical geometry.

Authors:  D Nikezic; A K M M Haque; K N Yu
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.674

2.  Assessment of environmental radon hazard using human respiratory tract models.

Authors:  K N Yu; B M F Lau; D Nikezic
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Uptae of radioactive lead following inhalation and injection.

Authors:  D V Booker; A C Chamberlain; D Newton; A N Stott
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Protection against radon-222 at home and at work. A report of a task group of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1993

5.  Uncertainty analysis of the weighted equivalent lung dose per unit exposure to radon progeny in the home.

Authors:  J W Marsh; A Birchall; G Butterweck; M D Dorrian; C Huet; X Ortega; A Reineking; G Tymen; Ch Schuler; A Vargas; G Vezzu; J Wendt
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Differential retention of 212Pb ions and insoluble particles in nasal mucosa of the rat.

Authors:  J R Greenhalgh; A Birchall; A C James; H Smith; A Hodgson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.609

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Nanoaerosols including radon decay products in outdoor and indoor air at a suburban site.

Authors:  Mateja Smerajec; Janja Vaupotič
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2012-02-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.