Literature DB >> 16710083

Accuracy of conventional plus transoral carotid ultrasonography in distinguishing pseudo-occlusion from total occlusion of the internal carotid artery.

Shigeru Fujimoto1, Kazunori Toyoda, Kazuhiro Kishikawa, Tooru Inoue, Kotaro Yasumori, Setsuro Ibayashi, Mitsuo Iida, Yasushi Okada.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the accuracy of conventional carotid ultrasonography (CCU) combined with transoral carotid ultrasonography (TOCU) for distinguishing pseudo-occlusion from total occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA).
METHODS: This study included 95 patients who were suspected of having an occlusion of the ICA on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and underwent both CCU and conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in order to confirm the diagnosis. TOCU was also performed to observe the cervical portion of the ICA distal to the stenosis. We compared the ultrasonographic findings with the DSA findings.
RESULTS: Twelve of the 95 patients were defined as having an ICA pseudo-occlusion on DSA. On B-mode images with CCU color Doppler, slight residual flow signals in the ICA lumen were shown in 20 patients. Among them, 2 patients had a pulsed Doppler waveform of the distal ICA occlusion pattern. Among the remaining 18 patients, 4 had a pulsed Doppler waveform of the to and fro flow pattern, and 14 had a weak antegrade flow pattern in the ICA lumen. The conventional ultrasonographic method showed 100% sensitivity with 93% specificity for diagnosing an ICA pseudo-occlusion. The addition of TOCU findings increased the specificity to 98%. In 2 patients, who were overdiagnosed as having an ICA pseudo-occlusion even using TOCU, DSA revealed an occlusion of the ICA distal to the ophthalmic artery with a severe stenosis of the proximal ICA.
CONCLUSIONS: Using conventional and transoral carotid ultrasonography, an ICA pseudo-occlusion can be diagnosed with higher accuracy. Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16710083     DOI: 10.1159/000093451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  6 in total

Review 1.  Carotid Near-Occlusion: A Comprehensive Review, Part 1--Definition, Terminology, and Diagnosis.

Authors:  E Johansson; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Carotid Near-Occlusion: A Comprehensive Review, Part 2--Prognosis and Treatment, Pathophysiology, Confusions, and Areas for Improvement.

Authors:  E Johansson; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Accuracy of CT Angiography for Differentiating Pseudo-Occlusion from True Occlusion or High-Grade Stenosis of the Extracranial ICA in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective MR CLEAN Substudy.

Authors:  M Kappelhof; H A Marquering; O A Berkhemer; J Borst; A van der Lugt; W H van Zwam; J A Vos; G Lycklama À Nijeholt; C B L M Majoie; B J Emmer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Angioplasty and stenting for the occluded internal carotid artery.

Authors:  Xuanye Yue; Gelin Xu; Wenhua Liu; Renliang Zhang; Zhiming Zhou; Qin Yin; Gangming Xi; Xinfeng Liu
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11

6.  Assessment of Apparent Internal Carotid Tandem Occlusion on High-Resolution Vessel Wall Imaging: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography.

Authors:  S Chai; Z Sheng; W Xie; C Wang; S Liu; R Tang; C Cao; W Xin; Z Guo; B Chang; X Yang; J Zhu; S Xia
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.825

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.