Literature DB >> 16710050

Bile acids stimulate PKCalpha autophosphorylation and activation: role in the attenuation of prostaglandin E1-induced cAMP production in human dermal fibroblasts.

Man Le1, Lada Krilov, Jianping Meng, Kelli Chapin-Kennedy, Susan Ceryak, Bernard Bouscarel.   

Abstract

The aim was to identify the specific PKC isoform(s) and their mechanism of activation responsible for the modulation of cAMP production by bile acids in human dermal fibroblasts. Stimulation of fibroblasts with 25-100 microM of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) led to YFP-PKCalpha and YFP-PKCdelta translocation in 30-60 min followed by a transient 24- to 48-h downregulation of the total PKCalpha, PKCdelta, and PKCepsilon protein expression by 30-50%, without affecting that of PKCzeta. Increased plasma membrane translocation of PKCalpha was associated with an increased PKCalpha phosphorylation, whereas increased PKCdelta translocation to the perinuclear domain was associated with an increased accumulation of phospho-PKCdelta Thr505 and Tyr311 in the nucleus. The PKCalpha specificity on the attenuation of cAMP production by CDCA was demonstrated with PKC downregulation or inhibition, as well as PKC isoform dominant-negative mutants. Under these same conditions, neither phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, p38 MAP kinase, p42/44 MAP kinase, nor PKA inhibitors had any significant effect on the CDCA-induced cAMP production attenuation. CDCA concentrations as low as 10 microM stimulated PKCalpha autophosphorylation in vitro. This bile acid effect required phosphatidylserine and was completely abolished by the presence of Gö6976. CDCA at concentrations less than 50 microM enhanced the PKCalpha activation induced by PMA, whereas greater CDCA concentrations reduced the PMA-induced PKCalpha activation. CDCA alone did not affect PKCalpha activity in vitro. In conclusion, although CDCA and UDCA activate different PKC isoforms, PKCalpha plays a major role in the bile acid-induced inhibition of cAMP synthesis in fibroblasts. This study emphasizes potential consequences of increased systemic bile acid concentrations and cellular bile acid accumulation in extrahepatic tissues during cholestatic liver diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16710050     DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00346.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  6 in total

Review 1.  Interaction of gut microbiota with bile acid metabolism and its influence on disease states.

Authors:  Alexander Khoruts; Michael J Sadowsky; Christopher Staley; Alexa R Weingarden
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Bile acid stimulates hepatocyte polarization through a cAMP-Epac-MEK-LKB1-AMPK pathway.

Authors:  Dong Fu; Yoshiyuki Wakabayashi; Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz; Irwin M Arias
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Bridging cell surface receptor with nuclear receptors in control of bile acid homeostasis.

Authors:  Shuangwei Li; Andrew Ni; Gen-sheng Feng
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Novel mechanism of impaired function of organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B3 in human hepatocytes: post-translational regulation of OATP1B3 by protein kinase C activation.

Authors:  John Powell; Taleah Farasyn; Kathleen Köck; Xiaojie Meng; Sonia Pahwa; Kim L R Brouwer; Wei Yue
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 5.  Post-Translational Modifications of FXR; Implications for Cholestasis and Obesity-Related Disorders.

Authors:  Monique D Appelman; Suzanne W van der Veen; Saskia W C van Mil
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Activation of NADPH oxidases leads to DNA damage in esophageal cells.

Authors:  Vikas Bhardwaj; Ravindran Caspa Gokulan; Andela Horvat; Liudmila Yermalitskaya; Olga Korolkova; Kay M Washington; Wael El-Rifai; Sergey I Dikalov; Alexander I Zaika
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.