BACKGROUND: Accurate and precise quantification of mRNA in whole blood is made difficult by gene expression changes during blood processing, and by variations and biases introduced by sample preparations. We sought to develop a quantitative whole-blood mRNA assay that eliminates blood purification, RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and target amplification while providing high-quality data in an easy assay format. METHODS: We performed single- and multiplex gene expression analysis with multiple hybridization probes to capture mRNA directly from blood lysate and used branched DNA to amplify the signal. The 96-well plate singleplex assay uses chemiluminescence detection, and the multiplex assay combines Luminex-encoded beads with fluorescent detection. RESULTS: The single- and multiplex assays could quantitatively measure as few as 6000 and 24,000 mRNA target molecules (0.01 and 0.04 amoles), respectively, in up to 25 microL of whole blood. Both formats had CVs < 10% and dynamic ranges of 3-4 logs. Assay sensitivities allowed quantitative measurement of gene expression in the minority of cells in whole blood. The signals from whole-blood lysate correlated well with signals from purified RNA of the same sample, and absolute mRNA quantification results from the assay were similar to those obtained by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Both single- and multiplex assay formats were compatible with common anticoagulants and PAXgene-treated samples; however, PAXgene preparations induced expression of known antiapoptotic genes in whole blood. CONCLUSIONS: Both the singleplex and the multiplex branched DNA assays can quantitatively measure mRNA expression directly from small volumes of whole blood. The assay offers an alternative to current technologies that depend on RNA isolation and is amenable to high-throughput gene expression analysis of whole blood.
BACKGROUND: Accurate and precise quantification of mRNA in whole blood is made difficult by gene expression changes during blood processing, and by variations and biases introduced by sample preparations. We sought to develop a quantitative whole-blood mRNA assay that eliminates blood purification, RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and target amplification while providing high-quality data in an easy assay format. METHODS: We performed single- and multiplex gene expression analysis with multiple hybridization probes to capture mRNA directly from blood lysate and used branched DNA to amplify the signal. The 96-well plate singleplex assay uses chemiluminescence detection, and the multiplex assay combines Luminex-encoded beads with fluorescent detection. RESULTS: The single- and multiplex assays could quantitatively measure as few as 6000 and 24,000 mRNA target molecules (0.01 and 0.04 amoles), respectively, in up to 25 microL of whole blood. Both formats had CVs < 10% and dynamic ranges of 3-4 logs. Assay sensitivities allowed quantitative measurement of gene expression in the minority of cells in whole blood. The signals from whole-blood lysate correlated well with signals from purified RNA of the same sample, and absolute mRNA quantification results from the assay were similar to those obtained by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Both single- and multiplex assay formats were compatible with common anticoagulants and PAXgene-treated samples; however, PAXgene preparations induced expression of known antiapoptotic genes in whole blood. CONCLUSIONS: Both the singleplex and the multiplex branched DNA assays can quantitatively measure mRNA expression directly from small volumes of whole blood. The assay offers an alternative to current technologies that depend on RNA isolation and is amenable to high-throughput gene expression analysis of whole blood.
Authors: Li Ding; Allen Mo; Kamonwan Jutivorakool; Minjal Pancholi; Steven M Holland; Sarah K Browne Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: Beatrice S Knudsen; April N Allen; Dale F McLerran; Robert L Vessella; Jonathan Karademos; Joan E Davies; Botoul Maqsodi; Gary K McMaster; Alan R Kristal Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: L Zhang; M Zhang; S Yang; Y Cao; S Bingrong Zhang; L Yin; Y Tian; Y Ma; A Zhang; P Okunieff; L Zhang Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: N L Spartano; S Lamon-Fava; N R Matthan; J Ronxhi; A S Greenberg; M S Obin; A H Lichtenstein Journal: Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 2.949