Literature DB >> 16709204

Regimens of misoprostol with mifepristone for early medical abortion: a randomised trial.

C Shannon1, E Wiebe, F Jacot, E Guilbert, S Dunn, W R Sheldon, B Winikoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, adverse effects and acceptability of the three most common misoprostol regimens used with mifepristone for medical abortion.
DESIGN: Randomised nonblinded trial.
SETTING: Three clinics associated with major research universities in Canada; two in major urban areas and one in a periurban area. POPULATION: Women of reproductive age.
METHODS: Consenting women presenting for abortion services with gestations less than 56 days and who met inclusion criteria were given 200 mg mifepristone orally and then randomised into three misoprostol study groups: (group I) 400 micrograms of oral misoprostol, (group II) 600 micrograms of oral misoprostol, and (group III) 800 micrograms of vaginal misoprostol. Misoprostol was self-administered at home 24-48 hours following mifepristone, and participants were instructed to take a second similar misoprostol dose at 24 hours after the initial dose if bleeding was less than a normal menstrual period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful abortion without surgery was 94.1%, with no significant differences across the three study groups (94.7% in group I, 93.4% in group II, and 94.3% in group III; P= 0.975).
RESULTS: Efficacy and adverse effects did not differ significantly across the three study groups. Pain increased significantly across the study and the gestational age groups and was associated with lower acceptability.
CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a range of safe and effective options for early medical abortion with mifepristone including a choice between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16709204     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00948.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  7 in total

Review 1.  Comparative effectiveness, safety and acceptability of medical abortion at home and in a clinic: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thoai D Ngo; Min Hae Park; Haleema Shakur; Caroline Free
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  Medical methods for first trimester abortion.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Kunyan Zhou; Dan Shan; Xiaoyan Luo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-24

Review 3.  Pain management for medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  John J Reynolds-Wright; Mulat A Woldetsadik; Chelsea Morroni; Sharon Cameron
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 4.  Medical methods for first trimester abortion.

Authors:  Regina Kulier; Nathalie Kapp; A Metin Gülmezoglu; G Justus Hofmeyr; Linan Cheng; Aldo Campana
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

5.  Comparing the World Health Organization-versus China-recommended protocol for first-trimester medical abortion: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Thoai D Ngo; Min Hae Park; Yuanhong Xiao
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-03-26

6.  Comparing telemedicine to in-clinic medication abortions induced with mifepristone and misoprostol.

Authors:  Ellen R Wiebe; Mackenzie Campbell; Harani Ramasamy; Michaela Kelly
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-04-11

7.  Medical termination for pregnancy in early first trimester (≤ 63 days) using combination of mifepristone and misoprostol or misoprostol alone: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferid A Abubeker; Antonella Lavelanet; Maria I Rodriguez; Caron Kim
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.809

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.