Literature DB >> 1670913

Electroencephalographic quantitation of opioid effect: comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and sufentanil.

J C Scott1, J E Cooke, D R Stanski.   

Abstract

The authors compared the pharmacodynamics of sufentanil with those of fentanyl using the electroencephalogram (EEG) as a measure of opioid drug effect. Sixteen patients were given a rapid infusion of sufentanil (18.75 micrograms/min) during EEG recording. To quantitate the opioid-induced slowing of the EEG, the authors analyzed its power spectrum and calculated the spectral edge. An inhibitory sigmoid Emax model of the maximal decrease in spectral edge produced by the opioid related spectral edge values to serum concentrations of sufentanil. The resulting data for the pharmacodynamic parameters of sufentanil were compared with fentanyl parameters that were obtained by reanalysis from an identically conducted, previously published study. The half-time of blood-brain equilibration (T1/2Keo) was not statistically different between sufentanil and fentanyl (6.2 +/- 2.8 vs. 6.6 +/- 1.7 min, mean +/- SD, respectively). The intrinsic potency of sufentanil, as measured by the serum concentration needed to cause half the maximal EEG slowing (IC50), was 12-fold greater (0.68 +/- 0.31 ng/ml) than that of fentanyl (8.1 +/- 2.2 ng/ml). The second part of the study verified the hypothesis that administration of equipotent bolus doses would produce equal onset times. Bolus injections of either 125 micrograms of sufentanil or 1,250 micrograms of fentanyl were given during EEG recording. The time from injection to 50% maximal EEG slowing (T50) was calculated for each patient. The values for T50 for the two groups did not differ. The authors conclude that fentanyl and sufentanil have similar pharmacodynamic profiles, the former being 12 times more potent than the latter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1670913     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199101000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  57 in total

1.  Predicting movement during anaesthesia by complexity analysis of electroencephalograms.

Authors:  X S Zhang; R J Roy
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Electroencephalogram effect measures and relationships between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of centrally acting drugs.

Authors:  J W Mandema; M Danhof
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling-a new classification of biomarkers.

Authors:  Meindert Danhof; Gunnar Alvan; Svein G Dahl; Jochen Kuhlmann; Gilles Paintaud
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  [Effect compartment equilibration and time-to-peak effect. Importance of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic principle for the daily clinical practice].

Authors:  J Bruhn; P M Schumacher; T W Bouillon
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy.

Authors:  R N Upton; T J Semple; P E Macintyre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Application of semilinear canonical correlation to the measurement of opioid drug effect.

Authors:  K M Gregg; J R Varvel; S L Shafer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-12

Review 7.  Bioequivalence criteria for transdermal fentanyl generics: do these need a relook?

Authors:  Carmen Walter; Lisa Felden; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Influence of biophase distribution and P-glycoprotein interaction on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the effects of morphine on the EEG.

Authors:  D Groenendaal; J Freijer; D de Mik; M R Bouw; M Danhof; E C M de Lange
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Calabadion 1 selectively reverses respiratory and central nervous system effects of fentanyl in a rat model.

Authors:  Tharusan Thevathasan; Stephanie D Grabitz; Peter Santer; Paul Rostin; Oluwaseun Akeju; James D Boghosian; Monica Gill; Lyle Isaacs; Joseph F Cotten; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  A physiologically-based recirculatory meta-model for nasal fentanyl in man.

Authors:  Richard N Upton; David J R Foster; Lona L Christrup; Ola Dale; Kristin Moksnes; Lars Popper
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.