Literature DB >> 16709029

Efficacy of antiangiogenic targeted toxins against glioblastoma multiforme.

Walter A Hall1, Daniel A Vallera.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Because the prognosis for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains poor, investigators have focused on developing new and more effective treatment modalities. Targeted toxins represent a new class of compounds composed of a potent protein toxin and a carrier ligand that will recognize cell surface antigens located on target tissue. A recombinant fusion protein was created that contains the translocation and catalytic portions of diphtheria toxin that are responsible for cell entry and killing, respectively, fused to the noninternalizing aminoterminal fragment portion of human plasminogen activator. This diptheria toxin-uPA fusion protein (DTAT) has the advantage over other fusion proteins of targeting malignant glioma cells and the endothelial cells of the neovasculature that express the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR). Another protein, DTAT13, was synthesized to target uPAR on the neovasculature and the uPAR and interleukin-13 receptor-expressing GBM cells. The authors describe the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of DTAT and DTAT13 against GBM.
METHODS: The in vitro cytotoxicity of DTAT and DTAT13 was measured using cell proliferation assays. In vivo studies were performed in which DTAT, DTAT13, or a control protein was injected directly into GBM flank tumors in athymic nude mice. Tumor volume was assessed over time and analyzed using the Student t-test. The systemic organ effects of DTAT and DTAT13 were examined functionally and histologically in tumor-free C57BL/6 mice. In vitro, DTAT and DTAT13 were found to be highly potent and selective against U118MG, U87MG, and U373MG GBM cell lines and human umbilical vein endothelial cells. In vivo, DTAT and DTAT13 both caused a statistically significant (p < 0.05) regression of U87MG GBM flank tumors when administered every other day at 10 mg/day for five doses. No tumor regression was seen in control animals. Both DTAT and DTAT13 had little effect on histological findings in the liver, kidney, spleen, and lungs. Serum analysis did not demonstrate an effect on blood urea nitrogen levels, but liver alanine aminotransferase levels rose to statistically significant (p = 0.046) but not life-threatening levels. Also, DTAT13 was less toxic than DTAT in studies of mortality rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Both DTAT and DTAT13 might have potential for clinical application against GBM because of their ability to target both the tumor cells and neovasculature simultaneously with an absence of serious systemic side effects. The discovery that DTAT13 was less toxic than DTAT indicated that the bispecific fusion protein might target a broader subset of antigenetically diverse patients with tumors while reducing the systemic exposure to toxin that would be necessary if two agents were administered separately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16709029     DOI: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.4.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  16 in total

Review 1.  Dual targeting strategies with bispecific antibodies.

Authors:  Roland E Kontermann
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Injectable SN-38-loaded Polymeric Depots for Cancer Chemotherapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Chawan Manaspon; Norased Nasongkla; Khuanjit Chaimongkolnukul; Pinunta Nittayacharn; Ketpat Vejjasilpa; Kanchana Kengkoom; Atthaporn Boongird; Suradej Hongeng
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Targeted toxins for glioblastoma multiforme: pre-clinical studies and clinical implementation.

Authors:  Marianela Candolfi; Kurt M Kroeger; Weidong Xiong; Chunyan Liu; Mariana Puntel; Kader Yagiz; Akm Ghulam Muhammad; Yohei Mineharu; David Foulad; Mia Wibowo; Hikmat Assi; Gregory J Baker; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.505

4.  Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider Review: Inclusion of Reproductive and Pathology End Points for Assessment of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity in Pharmaceutical Drug Development.

Authors:  Wendy G Halpern; Mehrdad Ameri; Christopher J Bowman; Michael R Elwell; Michael L Mirsky; Julian Oliver; Karen S Regan; Amera K Remick; Vicki L Sutherland; Kary E Thompson; Claudine Tremblay; Midori Yoshida; Lindsay Tomlinson
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 1.902

5.  Development of novel therapeutics targeting the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) and their translation toward the clinic.

Authors:  Andrew P Mazar; Richard W Ahn; Thomas V O'Halloran
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.116

6.  Molecular therapeutic targets for glioma angiogenesis.

Authors:  Shingo Takano; Toshiharu Yamashita; Osamu Ohneda
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  A novel tumor-activated ALA fusion protein for specific inhibition on the growth and invasion of breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231.

Authors:  Xiufeng Liu; Xintong Liu; Suwen Sunchen; Meixia Liu; Chen Shen; Juanjuan Wu; Wanli Zhao; Boyang Yu; Jihua Liu
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.419

8.  Intracerebral infusion of the bispecific targeted toxin DTATEGF in a mouse xenograft model of a human metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jun Huang; Yan Michael Li; Joan Massague; Andy Sicheneder; Daniel A Vallera; Walter A Hall
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.506

9.  A novel bispecific ligand-directed toxin designed to simultaneously target EGFR on human glioblastoma cells and uPAR on tumor neovasculature.

Authors:  Alexander K Tsai; Seunguk Oh; Hua Chen; Yanqun Shu; John R Ohlfest; Daniel A Vallera
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 4.506

10.  Prognostic molecular markers with no impact on decision-making: the paradox of gliomas based on a prospective study.

Authors:  M Wager; P Menei; J Guilhot; P Levillain; S Michalak; B Bataille; J-L Blanc; F Lapierre; P Rigoard; S Milin; F Duthe; D Bonneau; C-J Larsen; L Karayan-Tapon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.