Literature DB >> 16709017

Convection-enhanced delivery of therapeutics for brain disease, and its optimization.

Raghu Raghavan1, Martin L Brady, María Inmaculada Rodríguez-Ponce, Andreas Hartlep, Christoph Pedain, John H Sampson.   

Abstract

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is the continuous injection under positive pressure of a fluid containing a therapeutic agent. This technique was proposed and introduced by researchers from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) by the early 1990s to deliver drugs that would otherwise not cross the blood-brain barrier into the parenchyma and that would be too large to diffuse effectively over the required distances were they simply deposited into the tissue. Despite the many years that have elapsed, this technique remains experimental because of both the absence of approved drugs for intraparenchymal delivery and the difficulty of guaranteed delivery to delineated regions of the brain. During the first decade after the NIH researchers founded this analytical model of drug distribution, the results of several computer simulations that had been conducted according to more realistic assumptions were also published, revealing encouraging results. In the late 1990s, one of the authors of the present paper proposed the development of a computer model that would predict the distribution specific to a particular patient (brain) based on obtainable data from radiological images. Several key developments in imaging technology and, in particular, the relationships between image-obtained quantities and other parameters that enter models of the CED process have been required to implement this model. Note that delivery devices need further development. In the present paper we review key features of CED as well as modeling of the procedure and indulge in informed speculation on optimizing the direct delivery of therapeutic agents into brain tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16709017     DOI: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.4.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  93 in total

Review 1.  Novel delivery strategies for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jiangbing Zhou; Kofi-Buaku Atsina; Benjamin T Himes; Garth W Strohbehn; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  Analysis of a simulation algorithm for direct brain drug delivery.

Authors:  Kathryn Hammond Rosenbluth; Jan Felix Eschermann; Gabriele Mittermeyer; Rowena Thomson; Stephan Mittermeyer; Krystof S Bankiewicz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of Gd-albumin delivery to the rat hippocampus in vivo by convection-enhanced delivery.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Kim; Garrett W Astary; Tatiana L Nobrega; Svetlana Kantorovich; Paul R Carney; Thomas H Mareci; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 4.  Therapeutic approaches for HER2-positive brain metastases: circumventing the blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  Ankit I Mehta; Adam M Brufsky; John H Sampson
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  Current status of intratumoral therapy for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ankit I Mehta; Andreas Linninger; Maciej S Lesniak; Herbert H Engelhard
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  In vivo evaluation of needle force and friction stress during insertion at varying insertion speed into the brain.

Authors:  Fernando Casanova; Paul R Carney; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Intracranial MEMS based temozolomide delivery in a 9L rat gliosarcoma model.

Authors:  Byron C Masi; Betty M Tyler; Hansen Bow; Robert T Wicks; Yuan Xue; Henry Brem; Robert Langer; Michael J Cima
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Voxelized computational model for convection-enhanced delivery in the rat ventral hippocampus: comparison with in vivo MR experimental studies.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Kim; Garrett W Astary; Svetlana Kantorovich; Thomas H Mareci; Paul R Carney; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 9.  Convection-enhanced drug delivery for glioblastoma: a review.

Authors:  Randy S D'Amico; Manish K Aghi; Michael A Vogelbaum; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Validation of an effective implantable pump-infusion system for chronic convection-enhanced delivery of intracerebral topotecan in a large animal model.

Authors:  Randy S D'Amico; Justin A Neira; Jonathan Yun; Nikita G Alexiades; Matei Banu; Zachary K Englander; Benjamin C Kennedy; Timothy H Ung; Robert J Rothrock; Alexander Romanov; Xiaotao Guo; Binsheng Zhao; Adam M Sonabend; Peter Canoll; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.115

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.