Literature DB >> 16708943

Middle ear ossicles motion at hearing thresholds with air conduction and bone conduction stimulation.

Stefan Stenfelt1.   

Abstract

Hearing threshold data with bone conduction and air conduction stimulation are combined with physiological and mechanical measurements of the middle ear ossicles vibration to compute the vibration level of the ossicles at threshold stimulation. By comparing the displacements of the stapes footplate with the two stimulation modalities and assuming the vibration of the stapes footplate to be the input to the cochlea when stimulation is by air conduction, the importance of middle ear ossicles inertia with bone conduction stimulation is evaluated. Given the limitations of the analysis, the results indicate that the inertia of the middle ear is not an important contribution to the perception of BC sound for frequencies below 1.5 kHz; it seems to contribute to perception of bone conducted sound between the frequencies 1.5 and 3.5 kHz. At frequencies above 4 kHz, the analysis failed since the input to the cochlea is probably not through the oval window with bone conduction stimulation. Comparison of basilar membrane vibration data verified the calculations for frequencies between 0.8 and 3.5 kHz. It was also found that the fluid flow at the round window, rather than at the oval window, reflects the stimulation of the basilar membrane with bone conduction stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16708943     DOI: 10.1121/1.2184225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Middle-ear and inner-ear contribution to bone conduction in chinchilla: The development of Carhart's notch.

Authors:  David Chhan; Peter Bowers; Melissa L McKinnon; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Comparison of umbo velocity in air- and bone-conduction.

Authors:  Christof Röösli; David Chhan; Christopher Halpin; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Békésy's contributions to our present understanding of sound conduction to the inner ear.

Authors:  Sunil Puria; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Bone conduction hearing in congenital aural atresia.

Authors:  Lichun Zhang; Na Gao; Yanbo Yin; Lin Yang; Youzhou Xie; Ying Chen; Peidong Dai; Tianyu Zhang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Review of Whole Head Experimental Cochlear Promontory Vibration with Bone Conduction Stimulation and Investigation of Experimental Setup Effects.

Authors:  Srdjan Prodanovic; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Hearing Results in 151 Primary Stapedotomies for Otosclerosis: The Effects of Using Different Audiologic Parameters and Criteria on Success Rates.

Authors:  Morgane Saerens; Jean-Philippe Van Damme; Benoit Bihin; Pierre Garin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.619

7.  The Effect of Stimulation Position and Ear Canal Occlusion on Perception of Bone Conducted Sound.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Stefan Stenfelt; Shengjian Wu; Zhihao Yan; Jinqiu Sang; Chengshi Zheng; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

8.  Hypersensitivity of vestibular system to sound and pseudoconductive hearing loss in deaf patients.

Authors:  Seyede Faranak Emami
Journal:  ISRN Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-03

9.  Middle ear impedance studies in elderly patients implications on age-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Olusola Ayodele Sogebi
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.