Literature DB >> 16708000

Veterans Health Administration patients' use of the private sector for coronary revascularization in New York: opportunities to improve outcomes by directing care to high-performance hospitals.

William B Weeks1, David M Bott, Dorothy A Bazos, Stacey L Campbell, Rosemary Lombardo, Michael J Racz, Edward L Hannan, Steven M Wright, Elliott S Fisher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify Veterans Health Administration (VA) patients' utilization of coronary revascularization in the private sector and to assess the potential impact of directing this care to high-performance hospitals.
METHODS: Using VA and New York State administrative and clinical databases, we conducted a retrospective cohort study examining residents of New York State who were enrolled in the VA and underwent either coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 1999 or 2000 (n=6562) in either the VA or the private sector. We first calculated the proportion of revascularizations obtained in the VA and the private sector. We then identified the private sector hospitals in which these men obtained revascularizations and determined potential changes in mortality and travel burden associated with directing private sector care to high performance hospitals.
RESULTS: VA patients in New York were much more likely to undergo revascularization in the private sector than in VA hospitals: 83% of CABGs (2341/2829) and 87% of PCIs (4054/4665) were obtained in the private sector. Private sector utilization was distributed evenly across high- and low-mortality hospitals. Directing private-sector CABG surgery to high-performance hospitals could have reduced expected mortality by 24% (from 2.3% to 1.7%) and would only increase median travel time from 21 to 30 minutes. The benefit of redirecting PCI care is minimal.
CONCLUSIONS: For high-mortality procedures that veterans frequently obtain in the private sector, like CABG, directing care to high-performance hospitals may be an effective way to improve outcomes for veterans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16708000     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215888.20004.5e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  6 in total

1.  Reducing avoidable deaths among veterans: directing private-sector surgical care to high-performance hospitals.

Authors:  William B Weeks; Alan N West; Amy E Wallace; Richard E Lee; David C Goodman; Justin B Dimick; James P Bagian
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Rural veterans and access to high-quality care for high-risk surgeries.

Authors:  Alan N West; William B Weeks; Amy E Wallace
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Relationship between clinical conditions and use of Veterans Affairs health care among Medicare-enrolled veterans.

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; Margaret M Byrne; Christina N Daw; Jennifer Hasche; Brian Reis; Kenneth Pietz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Location of cancer surgery for older veterans with cancer.

Authors:  Elena M Kouri; Mary Beth Landrum; Elizabeth B Lamont; Sam Bozeman; Barbara J McNeil; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Use of VA and Medicare services by dually eligible veterans with psychiatric problems.

Authors:  Kathleen Carey; Maria E Montez-Rath; Amy K Rosen; Cindy L Christiansen; Susan Loveland; Susan L Ettner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The relationship between measured performance and satisfaction with care among clinically complex patients.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; Virginia W Chang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 5.128

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.