Literature DB >> 16707861

Inheritance of olfactory preferences II. Olfactory receptor neuron responses from Heliothis subflexa x Heliothis virescens hybrid male moths.

T C Baker1, C Quero, S A Ochieng', N J Vickers.   

Abstract

Single-cell electrophysiological recordings were obtained from olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) in sensilla trichodea on male antennae of hybrids formed mainly by crossing female Heliothis subflexa with male Heliothis virescens ('SV hybrids'). We recorded from the A-, B-, and C-type sensilla trichodea, with the latter two types housing ORNs exhibiting response profiles to different pheromone components that we had previously found to be characteristic for each species. For both the B- and the C-type SV hybrid sensilla, most of the ORNs exhibited a spike amplitude and ORN co-compartmentalization within sensilla that more strongly resembled the ORNs of parental H. subflexa rather than those of H. virescens. The overall mean dose-response profiles of the ORNs in hybrid C- and B-type sensilla were intermediate between those of the H. virescens and H. subflexa parental type ORNs. However, not all hybrid ORNs were intermediate in their tuning spectra, but rather ranged from those that closely resembled H. subflexa or H. virescens parental types to those that were intermediate, even on the same antenna. The most noteworthy shift in ORN responsiveness in hybrid males was an overall increase in sensitivity to Z9-14:Ald exhibited by Z9-16:Ald-responsive ORNs. Heightened cross-responsiveness to Z9-14:Ald by hybrid ORNs correlates well with observed behavioral cross-responsiveness of hybrids in which Z9-14:Ald could substitute for Z9-16:Ald in the pheromone blend, a behavior not observed in parental types. The hybrid ORN shifts involving greater sensitivity to Z9- 14:Ald also correlate well with studies of hybrid male antennal lobe interneurons that exhibited a shift toward greater cross-responsiveness to Z9-14:Ald and Z9- 16:Ald. We propose that the differences between parental H. virescens, H. subflexa, and SV hybrid male pheromone ORN responsiveness to Z9-16:Ald and Z9-14:Ald are most logically explained by an increased or decreased co-expression of two different odorant receptors for each of these compounds on the same ORN. Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16707861     DOI: 10.1159/000093375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  7 in total

Review 1.  Odor detection in insects: volatile codes.

Authors:  M de Bruyne; T C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Hairpencil volatiles influence interspecific courtship and mating between two related moth species.

Authors:  Neil Kirk Hillier; Neil J Vickers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Inheritance of central neuroanatomy and physiology related to pheromone preference in the male European corn borer.

Authors:  Zsolt Kárpáti; Shannon Olsson; Bill S Hansson; Teun Dekker
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Balanced olfactory antagonism as a concept for understanding evolutionary shifts in moth sex pheromone blends.

Authors:  Thomas C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 2.793

Review 5.  Processing of Pheromone Information in Related Species of Heliothine Moths.

Authors:  Bente G Berg; Xin-Cheng Zhao; Guirong Wang
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  The Inheritance of the Pheromone Sensory System in Two Helicoverpa Species: Dominance of H. armigera and Possible Introgression from H. assulta.

Authors:  Meng Xu; Jun-Feng Dong; Han Wu; Xin-Cheng Zhao; Ling-Qiao Huang; Chen-Zhu Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.505

7.  Transplant Antennae and Host Brain Interact to Shape Odor Perceptual Space in Male Moths.

Authors:  Seong-Gyu Lee; Kathy Poole; Charles E Linn; Neil J Vickers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.