PURPOSE: Ertumaxomab is an intact bispecific antibody targeting HER2/neu and CD3 with selective binding to activatory Fcgamma type I/III receptors, resulting in the formation of a tri-cell complex between tumor cells, T cells, and accessory cells. Patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled into a multicenter phase I dose-escalating trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three ascending doses of ertumaxomab (10-200 microg) were administered i.v. on day 1, 7 +/- 1, and 13 +/- 1. Safety and tolerability were the primary objectives. Secondary objectives were antitumor activity and different immunologic variables. RESULTS: Fifteen out of 17 enrolled patients completed the study. One hundred micrograms was identified as the maximal tolerable single dose. Most drug-related adverse events were mild and transient including fever (94%), rigors (47%), headache (35%), nausea (29%), vomiting (29%). Grades 3 and 4 (Common Toxicity Criteria) were lymphocytopenia (76%) and elevation of liver enzymes (47%). One patient (200 mug dose) developed severe hypotension and respiratory distress syndrome, another patient (150 mug dose) developed a systemic inflammatory response syndrome and acute renal failure. Aggravation of congestive heart failure was seen in one patient with preexisting ventricular dysfunction after administration of the third dose (200 microg). All adverse events were fully reversible. Antitumor response was seen in 5 out of 15 evaluable patients (one with a complete response, two with partial responses, two with stable disease) at dose levels of > or = 100 microg. Measurements of cytokines (interleukin-6, interleukin-2, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and IFN-gamma) suggest a strong T helper cell type 1-associated immune response. The induction of human anti-mouse/anti-rat antibodies was detected in 5 out of 16 (31%) patients. DISCUSSION: Treatment with triple infusions of ertumaxomab yields a strong immunologic response. Doses up to 100 microg can be safely infused with close monitoring of patients. The observed clinical responses are encouraging and indicate antitumor efficacy.
PURPOSE:Ertumaxomab is an intact bispecific antibody targeting HER2/neu and CD3 with selective binding to activatory Fcgamma type I/III receptors, resulting in the formation of a tri-cell complex between tumor cells, T cells, and accessory cells. Patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled into a multicenter phase I dose-escalating trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three ascending doses of ertumaxomab (10-200 microg) were administered i.v. on day 1, 7 +/- 1, and 13 +/- 1. Safety and tolerability were the primary objectives. Secondary objectives were antitumor activity and different immunologic variables. RESULTS: Fifteen out of 17 enrolled patients completed the study. One hundred micrograms was identified as the maximal tolerable single dose. Most drug-related adverse events were mild and transient including fever (94%), rigors (47%), headache (35%), nausea (29%), vomiting (29%). Grades 3 and 4 (Common Toxicity Criteria) were lymphocytopenia (76%) and elevation of liver enzymes (47%). One patient (200 mug dose) developed severe hypotension and respiratory distress syndrome, another patient (150 mug dose) developed a systemic inflammatory response syndrome and acute renal failure. Aggravation of congestive heart failure was seen in one patient with preexisting ventricular dysfunction after administration of the third dose (200 microg). All adverse events were fully reversible. Antitumor response was seen in 5 out of 15 evaluable patients (one with a complete response, two with partial responses, two with stable disease) at dose levels of > or = 100 microg. Measurements of cytokines (interleukin-6, interleukin-2, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and IFN-gamma) suggest a strong T helper cell type 1-associated immune response. The induction of human anti-mouse/anti-rat antibodies was detected in 5 out of 16 (31%) patients. DISCUSSION: Treatment with triple infusions of ertumaxomab yields a strong immunologic response. Doses up to 100 microg can be safely infused with close monitoring of patients. The observed clinical responses are encouraging and indicate antitumor efficacy.
Authors: Yoon K Loke; Albert Ferro; Lionel D Lewis; Adam F Cohen; Andrew Somogyi; James M Ritter Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke Journal: Drugs Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Jenny J Y Lin; Shalini T Low-Nam; Katherine N Alfieri; Darren B McAffee; Nicole C Fay; Jay T Groves Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Yu Cao; Jun Y Axup; Jennifer S Y Ma; Rongsheng E Wang; Seihyun Choi; Virginie Tardif; Reyna K V Lim; Holly M Pugh; Brian R Lawson; Gus Welzel; Stephanie A Kazane; Ying Sun; Feng Tian; Shailaja Srinagesh; Tsotne Javahishvili; Peter G Schultz; Chan Hyuk Kim Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Irene Rius Ruiz; Rocio Vicario; Beatriz Morancho; Cristina Bernadó Morales; Enrique J Arenas; Sylvia Herter; Anne Freimoser-Grundschober; Jitka Somandin; Johannes Sam; Oliver Ast; Águeda Martinez Barriocanal; Antonio Luque; Marta Escorihuela; Ismael Varela; Isabel Cuartas; Paolo Nuciforo; Roberta Fasani; Vicente Peg; Isabel Rubio; Javier Cortés; Violeta Serra; Santiago Escriva-de-Romani; Jeff Sperinde; Ahmed Chenna; Weidong Huang; John Winslow; Joan Albanell; Joan Seoane; Maurizio Scaltriti; Jose Baselga; Josep Tabernero; Pablo Umana; Marina Bacac; Cristina Saura; Christian Klein; Joaquín Arribas Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 17.956