Literature DB >> 16706714

Multiple testing methods for ChIP-Chip high density oligonucleotide array data.

Sündüz Keleş1, Mark J van der Laan, Sandrine Dudoit, Simon E Cawley.   

Abstract

Cawley et al. (2004) have recently mapped the locations of binding sites for three transcription factors along human chromosomes 21 and 22 using ChIP-Chip experiments. ChIP-Chip experiments are a new approach to the genomewide identification of transcription factor binding sites and consist of chromatin (Ch) immunoprecipitation (IP) of transcription factor-bound genomic DNA followed by high density oligonucleotide hybridization (Chip) of the IP-enriched DNA. We investigate the ChIP-Chip data structure and propose methods for inferring the location of transcription factor binding sites from these data. The proposed methods involve testing for each probe whether it is part of a bound sequence using a scan statistic that takes into account the spatial structure of the data. Different multiple testing procedures are considered for controlling the familywise error rate and false discovery rate. A nested-Bonferroni adjustment, which is more powerful than the traditional Bonferroni adjustment when the test statistics are dependent, is discussed. Simulation studies show that taking into account the spatial structure of the data substantially improves the sensitivity of the multiple testing procedures. Application of the proposed methods to ChIP-Chip data for transcription factor p53 identified many potential target binding regions along human chromosomes 21 and 22. Among these identified regions, 18% fall within a 3 kb vicinity of the 5'UTR of a known gene or CpG island and 31% fall between the codon start site and the codon end site of a known gene but not inside an exon. More than half of these potential target sequences contain the p53 consensus binding site or very close matches to it. Moreover, these target segments include the 13 experimentally verified p53 binding regions of Cawley et al. (2004), as well as 49 additional regions that show higher hybridization signal than these 13 experimentally verified regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16706714     DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  14 in total

1.  Generalizing moving averages for tiling arrays using combined p-value statistics.

Authors:  Katerina J Kechris; Brian Biehs; Thomas B Kornberg
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-08-06

2.  Model-based analysis of tiling-arrays for ChIP-chip.

Authors:  W Evan Johnson; Wei Li; Clifford A Meyer; Raphael Gottardo; Jason S Carroll; Myles Brown; X Shirley Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  CMARRT: a tool for the analysis of ChIP-chip data from tiling arrays by incorporating the correlation structure.

Authors:  Pei Fen Kuan; Hyonho Chun; Sündüz Keleş
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2008

4.  ChIP-on-chip significance analysis reveals large-scale binding and regulation by human transcription factor oncogenes.

Authors:  Adam A Margolin; Teresa Palomero; Pavel Sumazin; Andrea Califano; Adolfo A Ferrando; Gustavo Stolovitzky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Novel TRF1/BRF target genes revealed by genome-wide analysis of Drosophila Pol III transcription.

Authors:  Yoh Isogai; Shinako Takada; Robert Tjian; Sündüz Keleş
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Epigenetic change detection and pattern recognition via Bayesian hierarchical hidden Markov models.

Authors:  Xinlei Wang; Miao Zang; Guanghua Xiao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  TileProbe: modeling tiling array probe effects using publicly available data.

Authors:  Jennifer Toolan Judy; Hongkai Ji
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  HAT: hypergeometric analysis of tiling-arrays with application to promoter-GeneChip data.

Authors:  Erdogan Taskesen; Renee Beekman; Jeroen de Ridder; Bas J Wouters; Justine K Peeters; Ivo P Touw; Marcel J T Reinders; Ruud Delwel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Improved ChIP-chip analysis by a mixture model approach.

Authors:  Wei Sun; Michael J Buck; Mukund Patel; Ian J Davis
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Bayesian modeling of ChIP-chip data using latent variables.

Authors:  Mingqi Wu; Faming Liang; Yanan Tian
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.