Literature DB >> 16706575

Cost considerations in the medical management of glaucoma in the US: estimated yearly costs and cost effectiveness of bimatoprost compared with other medications.

Javier Soto.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16706575     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200624050-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Assessing quality in decision analytic cost-effectiveness models. A suggested framework and example of application.

Authors:  M Sculpher; E Fenwick; K Claxton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Efficacy and safety of bimatoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 30-day comparison with latanoprost.

Authors:  H DuBiner; D Cooke; M Dirks; W C Stewart; A M VanDenburgh; C Felix
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  A persistency and economic analysis of latanoprost, bimatoprost, or beta-blockers in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Douglas G Day; Paul N Schacknow; Elizabeth D Sharpe; John C Ellyn; John C Kulze; Anisa B Threlkeld; Evan D Jones; Reay H Brown; Jessica N Jenkins; William C Stewart
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Three-month comparison of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  S Gandolfi; S T Simmons; R Sturm; K Chen; A M VanDenburgh
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Measurement of persistence and adherence to regimens of IOP-lowering glaucoma medications using pharmacy claims data.

Authors:  Jacob Wilensky; Richard G Fiscella; Angeline M Carlson; Lisa S Morris; John Walt
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  A comparison of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 12-week, randomized, masked-evaluator multicenter study.

Authors:  Richard K Parrish; Paul Palmberg; Wang-Pui Sheu
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Latanoprost 0.005% versus bimatoprost 0.03% in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Anastasios G P Konstas; John M Katsimbris; Nikolaos Lallos; George P Boukaras; Jessica N Jenkins; William C Stewart
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Compliance and persistency in glaucoma follow-up treatment.

Authors:  Gail F Schwartz
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  24-Hour IOP control with once-daily bimatoprost, timolol gel-forming solution, or latanoprost: a 1-month, randomized, comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Thomas R Walters; Harvey B DuBiner; Susan P Carpenter; Bashir Khan; Amanda M VanDenburgh
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.048

10.  A six-month randomized clinical trial comparing the intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma.

Authors:  Robert S Noecker; Monte S Dirks; Neil T Choplin; Paula Bernstein; Amy L Batoosingh; Scott M Whitcup
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.258

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.