Literature DB >> 16705963

Model selection for geostatistical models.

Jennifer A Hoeting1, Richard A Davis, Andrew A Merton, Sandra E Thompson.   

Abstract

We consider the problem of model selection for geospatial data. Spatial correlation is often ignored in the selection of explanatory variables, and this can influence model selection results. For example, the importance of particular explanatory variables may not be apparent when spatial correlation is ignored. To address this problem, we consider the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) as applied to a geostatistical model. We offer a heuristic derivation of the AIC in this context and provide simulation results that show that using AIC for a geostatistical model is superior to the often-used traditional approach of ignoring spatial correlation in the selection of explanatory variables. These ideas are further demonstrated via a model for lizard abundance. We also apply the principle of minimum description length (MDL) to variable selection for the geostatistical model. The effect of sampling design on the selection of explanatory covariates is also explored. R software to implement the geostatistical model selection methods described in this paper is available in the Supplement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16705963     DOI: 10.1890/04-0576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  19 in total

1.  Patterns of spatial autocorrelation in stream water chemistry.

Authors:  Erin E Peterson; Andrew A Merton; David M Theobald; N Scott Urquhart
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Performance of Information Criteria for Spatial Models.

Authors:  Hyeyoung Lee; Sujit K Ghosh
Journal:  J Stat Comput Simul       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 1.424

3.  Taxonomic scale-dependence of habitat niche partitioning and biotic neighbourhood on survival of tropical tree seedlings.

Authors:  Simon A Queenborough; David F R P Burslem; Nancy C Garwood; Renato Valencia
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Comparing spatial regression to random forests for large environmental data sets.

Authors:  Eric W Fox; Jay M Ver Hoef; Anthony R Olsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Predicting water quality impaired stream segments using landscape-scale data and a regional geostatistical model: a case study in Maryland.

Authors:  Erin E Peterson; N Scott Urquhart
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Variable selection for spatial random field predictors under a Bayesian mixed hierarchical spatial model.

Authors:  Ji-in Kim; Andrew B Lawson; Suzanne McDermott; C Marjorie Aelion
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

7.  Bayesian spatial modeling of disease risk in relation to multivariate environmental risk fields.

Authors:  Ji-in Kim; Andrew B Lawson; Suzanne McDermott; C Marjorie Aelion
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Bayesian variable selection for multivariate spatially varying coefficient regression.

Authors:  Brian J Reich; Montserrat Fuentes; Amy H Herring; Kelly R Evenson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Global pyrogeography: the current and future distribution of wildfire.

Authors:  Meg A Krawchuk; Max A Moritz; Marc-André Parisien; Jeff Van Dorn; Katharine Hayhoe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  On the importance of shrub encroachment by sprouters, climate, species richness and anthropic factors for ecosystem multifunctionality in semi-arid Mediterranean ecosystems.

Authors:  José L Quero; Fernando T Maestre; Victoria Ochoa; Miguel García-Gómez; Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Journal:  Ecosystems       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.