Literature DB >> 16705429

[Comparison of open versus percutaneous treatment for humeral head fracture].

F Kralinger1, A Irenberger, C Lechner, M Wambacher, K Golser, G Sperner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The hypothesis of this study was that percutaneous techniques lower the risk of post-traumatic avascular necrosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study 83 patients were followed up clinically and radiologically for signs of avascular necrosis and nonunion after open or percutaneous treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Mean age was 50 years. Fractures were classified in 22 patients (26.5%) as two part, in 21 patients (25.3%) as three part, in 39 patients (47%) as four part, and in 1 patient (1.2%) as fracture dislocation (Neer classification). Fractures were treated in 12 patients (14.5%) by ORIF (open reduction and internal fixation) and in 71 patients (85.5%) by CRPF (closed reduction and percutaneous fixation). Both groups were statistically equally distributed according to fracture type (Mann-Whitney U, p=0.267) and age (One-way-Annova, p=0.740). The postoperative regime did not differ between the two groups.
RESULTS: Patients suffered significantly more avascular necrosis after open treatment [five patients (50%) versus eight patients (12.7%) in the percutaneous group, Mann-Whitney, p=0.004]. The risk for avascular necrosis and nonunion increased with age. Mean age of patients with avascular necrosis was 57 years, and the age of patients with nonunion was 67 years.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous treatment of humeral head fractures seems to be a reliable method for lowering the risk of avascular necrosis in young patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16705429     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-005-1053-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  12 in total

Review 1.  Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults--a systematic review of management.

Authors:  A Misra; R Kapur; N Maffulli
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Outcome after hemiarthroplasty for three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  K Zyto; W A Wallace; S P Frostick; B J Preston
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  B Kristiansen; S W Christensen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1986-08

4.  [Humeral head replacement with reconstruction of the tuberosities and the cuff in 4-fragment displaced fractures. Current results and technics].

Authors:  C S Neer; S J McIlveen
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1988

5.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Part I. Classification and evaluation. By Charles S. Neer, I, 1970.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Percutaneous fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  H Resch; P Povacz; R Fröhlich; M Wambacher
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-03

Review 8.  [Fractures of the proximal humerus].

Authors:  P Habermeyer; L Schweiberer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Outcome after primary and secondary hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  U Bosch; M Skutek; R W Fremerey; H Tscherne
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients.

Authors:  F Kralinger; R Schwaiger; M Wambacher; E Farrell; W Menth-Chiari; G Lajtai; C Hübner; H Resch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-03
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Current status of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: specific part II].

Authors:  T Neubauer; M Wagner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Percutaneous fixation with Schanz screws for displaced two- and three- part fractures of the proximal humerus in patients above fifty years of age.

Authors:  Abdelsalam Eid; Mohamed Osman; Hosam-Eldeen Fekry
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2011-04

3.  Comparison between minimally invasive, percutaneous osteosynthesis and locking plate osteosynthesis in 3-and 4-part proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Reinhold Ortmaier; Verena Filzmaier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Robert Bogner; Thomas Neubauer; Herbert Resch; Alexander Auffarth
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Minimally Invasive Treatment of Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures in Patients Older Than 70 Years Using the Humerusblock.

Authors:  Robert Bogner; Reinhold Ortmaier; Philipp Moroder; Stefanie Karpik; Christof Wutte; Stefan Lederer; Alexander Auffarth; Herbert Resch
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.