BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Depending on cultivar, surfaces of young leaves of Vitis vinifera may be glabrous-green ('Soultanina') or transiently have anthocyanins ('Siriki') or pubescence ('Athiri'). A test is made of the hypothesis that anthocyanins and pubescence act as light screens affording a photoprotective advantage to the corresponding leaves, and an assessment is made of the magnitude of their effect. METHODS: Measurements were made on young leaves of the three cultivars in spring under field conditions. Photosynthetic gas-exchange and in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence were measured. Photosynthetic and photoprotective pigments were analysed by HPLC. KEY RESULTS: Compared with glabrous-green leaves, both anthocyanic and pubescent leaves had greater dark-adapted PSII photochemical efficiency and net photosynthesis. In leaves possessing either anthocyanins or pubescence, the ratio of xanthophyll cycle components to total chlorophyll, and mid-day de-epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle were considerably smaller, than in glabrous-green leaves. These differences were more evident in pubescent leaves, probably indicating that trichomes were more effective in decreasing light stress than anthocyanins in the epidermis. CONCLUSIONS: Light screens, especially in the form of pubescence, decrease the risk of photoinhibition whilst allowing leaves to maintain a smaller content of xanthophyll cycle components and depend less on xanthophyll cycle energy dissipation. This combination of photoprotective features, i.e. decreased photon flux to the photosynthetic apparatus and lower xanthophyll cycle utilization rates may be particularly advantageous under stressful conditions.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Depending on cultivar, surfaces of young leaves of Vitis vinifera may be glabrous-green ('Soultanina') or transiently have anthocyanins ('Siriki') or pubescence ('Athiri'). A test is made of the hypothesis that anthocyanins and pubescence act as light screens affording a photoprotective advantage to the corresponding leaves, and an assessment is made of the magnitude of their effect. METHODS: Measurements were made on young leaves of the three cultivars in spring under field conditions. Photosynthetic gas-exchange and in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence were measured. Photosynthetic and photoprotective pigments were analysed by HPLC. KEY RESULTS: Compared with glabrous-green leaves, both anthocyanic and pubescent leaves had greater dark-adapted PSII photochemical efficiency and net photosynthesis. In leaves possessing either anthocyanins or pubescence, the ratio of xanthophyll cycle components to total chlorophyll, and mid-day de-epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle were considerably smaller, than in glabrous-green leaves. These differences were more evident in pubescent leaves, probably indicating that trichomes were more effective in decreasing light stress than anthocyanins in the epidermis. CONCLUSIONS: Light screens, especially in the form of pubescence, decrease the risk of photoinhibition whilst allowing leaves to maintain a smaller content of xanthophyll cycle components and depend less on xanthophyll cycle energy dissipation. This combination of photoprotective features, i.e. decreased photon flux to the photosynthetic apparatus and lower xanthophyll cycle utilization rates may be particularly advantageous under stressful conditions.
Authors: Daniel H Chitwood; Aashish Ranjan; Ciera C Martinez; Lauren R Headland; Thinh Thiem; Ravi Kumar; Michael F Covington; Tommy Hatcher; Daniel T Naylor; Sharon Zimmerman; Nora Downs; Nataly Raymundo; Edward S Buckler; Julin N Maloof; Mallikarjuna Aradhya; Bernard Prins; Lin Li; Sean Myles; Neelima R Sinha Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Victoria Fernández; Domingo Sancho-Knapik; Paula Guzmán; José Javier Peguero-Pina; Luis Gil; George Karabourniotis; Mohamed Khayet; Costas Fasseas; José Alejandro Heredia-Guerrero; Antonio Heredia; Eustaquio Gil-Pelegrín Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Barry A Logan; William C Stafstrom; Michael J L Walsh; Jaret S Reblin; Kevin S Gould Journal: Photosynth Res Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Tatyana A Pshenichnikova; Alexey V Doroshkov; Svetlana V Osipova; Alexey V Permyakov; Marina D Permyakova; Vadim M Efimov; Dmitry A Afonnikov Journal: Planta Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 4.116