Literature DB >> 16704918

The useful field of view test: normative data for older adults.

Jerri D Edwards1, Lesley A Ross, Virginia G Wadley, Olivio J Clay, Michael Crowe, Daniel L Roenker, Karlene K Ball.   

Abstract

The Useful Field of View test (UFOV) is increasingly used in clinical and rehabilitation settings. To date there have been no normative data for adjusted performance comparisons across demographically-similar, elderly peers. This study examined demographic and cognitive influences on the UFOV in a sample of 2759 participants (65-94 years of age). Performance was found to differ by age and education. Regression analyses examined the relative contributions of age, education, mental status, vision, and health to UFOV performance. All of these factors were found to significantly contribute to UFOV performance, with age accounting for the most variance and education accounting for the least. Normative tables for the UFOV by age and education are provided. These norms will allow researchers and clinicians to compare UFOV performance with similar peers and may help in identifying elderly persons who would benefit from speed of processing training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16704918     DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  88 in total

Review 1.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Impaired attentional disengagement in older adults with useful field of view decline.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Monica N Lees; John D Lee; Matthew Rizzo; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  The impact of feedback on self-rated driving ability and driving self-regulation among older adults.

Authors:  Michelle L Ackerman; Michael Crowe; David E Vance; Virginia G Wadley; Cynthia Owsley; Karlene K Ball
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2010-11-11

4.  Incremental validity of Useful Field of View subtests for the prediction of instrumental activities of daily living.

Authors:  Frederik Aust; Jerri D Edwards
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.475

5.  The longitudinal impact of cognitive speed of processing training on driving mobility.

Authors:  Jerri D Edwards; Charlsie Myers; Lesley A Ross; Daniel L Roenker; Gayla M Cissell; Alexis M McLaughlin; Karlene K Ball
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-06-02

6.  Can we improve clinical prediction of at-risk older drivers?

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; R Julius Anastasio; Sarah S Sheldon; Margaret G O'Connor; Ann M Hollis; Piers D Howe; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2013-07-16

7.  Predicting older driver on-road performance by means of the useful field of view and trail making test part B.

Authors:  Sherrilene Classen; Yanning Wang; Alexander M Crizzle; Sandra M Winter; Desiree N Lanford
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct

8.  Examination of Heart Failure as a Predictor of Driving Cessation.

Authors:  Bernadette A Fausto; Adrian N S Badana; Olivia M Valdes; Ponrathi Athilingam; Jerri D Edwards
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2017-11-03

9.  What predicts changes in useful field of view test performance?

Authors:  Melissa Lunsman; Jerri D Edwards; Ross Andel; Brent J Small; Karlene K Ball; Daniel L Roenker
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12

10.  An examination of mediators of the transfer of cognitive speed of processing training to everyday functional performance.

Authors:  Jerri D Edwards; Christine L Ruva; Jennifer L O'Brien; Christine B Haley; Jennifer J Lister
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.