Literature DB >> 16704893

Extent of prostate-specific antigen contamination in the Spanish section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Marcos Luján1, Alvaro Páez, Carlos Pascual, Javier Angulo, Elena Miravalles, Antonio Berenguer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The performance of tests outside prostate cancer screening trials (PSA contamination) may affect their statistical power. The present study addressed the extent of PSA contamination in the Spanish section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and its impact on biopsy performance and prostate cancer detection.
METHODS: Data linkage was performed to address screening-related interventions outside the study. Four databases were used: (1) Spanish ERSPC database (n=4278), (2) laboratory database with all PSA determinations (n=31,140), (3) database of 1608 prostate biopsies, and (4) records of all prostate cancers (n=819) diagnosed at our centre. PSA contamination, biopsy performance, and cancer detection rates were calculated.
RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 6.6 yr. A total of 2201 PSA determinations were performed for 1253 men. Cumulative PSA contamination was 29.3% (17% in the control arm during the first 4 yr). A higher proportion of men undergoing biopsies was found in the screening arm (21.3% vs. 2.9% in the control arm, p<0.0001). Similarly, higher cancer detection rates were found in the screening (4.7% vs. 1.2% in the control arm, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the PSA contamination rate has increased during the last years, but its impact on biopsy performance and cancer detection in the control arm of the trial is limited and not likely to compromise the statistical power of the ERSPC trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16704893     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  5 in total

1.  Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Time to Change the Dominant Forces on the Pendulum.

Authors:  Jonathan E Shoag; Peter N Schlegel; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Recommandations de l'Association des urologues du Canada sur le dépistage et le diagnostic précoce du cancer de la prostate.

Authors:  Ricardo A Rendon; Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan So; Phillipe Violette; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  The Impact of Design and Performance in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Differences Between ERSPC Centers.

Authors:  Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Jan Adolfsson; Anssi Auvinen; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  UPDATE - 2022 Canadian Urological Association recommendations on prostate cancer screening and early diagnosis Endorsement of the 2021 Cancer Care Ontario guidelines on prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan I So; Philippe D Violette; Rodney H Breau; Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.052

5.  The efficacy of prostate-specific antigen screening: Impact of key components in the ERSPC and PLCO trials.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Roman Gulati; Sue M Moss; Jonas Hugosson; Paul F Pinsky; Christine D Berg; Anssi Auvinen; Gerald L Andriole; Monique J Roobol; E David Crawford; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marco Zappa; Marcos Luján; Arnauld Villers; Tiago M de Carvalho; Eric J Feuer; Alex Tsodikov; Angela B Mariotto; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 6.860

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.