AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the use of peribulbar anaesthesia (PA) in paediatric cataract surgery in rural areas in China, where there are limitations in expertise and equipment for general anaesthesia (GA). METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of carrying out paediatric cataract surgery under PA in children aged 7-15 years. Informed consent was obtained from the subjects and their parents. Children were assessed for their suitability for PA. Peribulbar anaesthesia was given as a peribulbar block using a 2% lidocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine-hyaluronidase mixture administered before lens aspiration with intraocular lens implantation. The acceptability of the PA was evaluated by questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were recruited. Their mean age was 12 +/- 2 years (range 7-15 years). None required conversion to GA. All subjects regarded PA as either totally acceptable (63.2%) or acceptable (36.8%). The mean pain scores (from 0 to 100) during the injection and surgery were 28 +/- 26 and 6 +/- 8, respectively. Seventeen patients (89.5%) said they would prefer PA if choices in anaesthesia were offered again. CONCLUSIONS: Peribulbar anaesthesia can be considered as a viable option in selected children undergoing cataract surgery when facilities for safe and optimal general anaesthesia are unavailable.
AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the use of peribulbar anaesthesia (PA) in paediatric cataract surgery in rural areas in China, where there are limitations in expertise and equipment for general anaesthesia (GA). METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of carrying out paediatric cataract surgery under PA in children aged 7-15 years. Informed consent was obtained from the subjects and their parents. Children were assessed for their suitability for PA. Peribulbar anaesthesia was given as a peribulbar block using a 2% lidocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine-hyaluronidase mixture administered before lens aspiration with intraocular lens implantation. The acceptability of the PA was evaluated by questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were recruited. Their mean age was 12 +/- 2 years (range 7-15 years). None required conversion to GA. All subjects regarded PA as either totally acceptable (63.2%) or acceptable (36.8%). The mean pain scores (from 0 to 100) during the injection and surgery were 28 +/- 26 and 6 +/- 8, respectively. Seventeen patients (89.5%) said they would prefer PA if choices in anaesthesia were offered again. CONCLUSIONS: Peribulbar anaesthesia can be considered as a viable option in selected children undergoing cataract surgery when facilities for safe and optimal general anaesthesia are unavailable.