Rebecca Harrison1, Elizabeth Allen. 1. Division of Hospitalist Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. harrisor@ohsu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of resident duty-hour regulations on the inpatient teaching experience. OBJECTIVE: Provide descriptive information on the effect of resident duty-hour regulations on attendings and the educational environment. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of attending focus groups and e-mail survey of residents in Internal Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatient attending physicians at 2 academic centers and residents at the affiliated university-based Internal Medicine residency program in Portland, OR. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of eligible attendings participated in 2 focus groups. Three themes were generated: increased clinical role, altered time management, and altered teaching. Attending physicians report performing more clinical work, teaching less, using more focused teaching methods, and experiencing an increased perception of intensity. Forty percent of eligible residents completed our e-mail survey. We organized residents data using the same 3 themes as attending physician data. Residents observed attending physicians performing increased clinical work, being more time aware, delivering more focused teaching, and having less time to teach. Participants noted changes in autonomy and professionalism. Strategies to enhance teaching effectiveness in the new environment were described. CONCLUSION: Duty-hour regulations have increased attending clinical responsibility and decreased teaching time in 1 residency program, leading to the perception of a more intense attending experience. Duty-hour regulations encourage educators to determine what is critical to preserve in the educational experiences of learners and challenge us to reexamine autonomy and professionalism in training.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of resident duty-hour regulations on the inpatient teaching experience. OBJECTIVE: Provide descriptive information on the effect of resident duty-hour regulations on attendings and the educational environment. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of attending focus groups and e-mail survey of residents in Internal Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatient attending physicians at 2 academic centers and residents at the affiliated university-based Internal Medicine residency program in Portland, OR. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of eligible attendings participated in 2 focus groups. Three themes were generated: increased clinical role, altered time management, and altered teaching. Attending physicians report performing more clinical work, teaching less, using more focused teaching methods, and experiencing an increased perception of intensity. Forty percent of eligible residents completed our e-mail survey. We organized residents data using the same 3 themes as attending physician data. Residents observed attending physicians performing increased clinical work, being more time aware, delivering more focused teaching, and having less time to teach. Participants noted changes in autonomy and professionalism. Strategies to enhance teaching effectiveness in the new environment were described. CONCLUSION: Duty-hour regulations have increased attending clinical responsibility and decreased teaching time in 1 residency program, leading to the perception of a more intense attending experience. Duty-hour regulations encourage educators to determine what is critical to preserve in the educational experiences of learners and challenge us to reexamine autonomy and professionalism in training.
Authors: Michael P Phy; Kenneth P Offord; Dennis M Manning; John B Bundrick; Jeanne M Huddleston Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Daniel J Buysse; Barbara Barzansky; David Dinges; Eileen Hogan; Carl E Hunt; Judith Owens; Mark Rosekind; Raymond Rosen; Frank Simon; Sigrid Veasey; Francine Wiest Journal: Sleep Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Brita Roy; Analia Castiglioni; Ryan R Kraemer; Amanda H Salanitro; Lisa L Willett; Richard M Shewchuk; Haiyan Qu; Gustavo Heudebert; Robert M Centor Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Rebecca Blankenburg; Joan F Hilton; Patrick Yuan; Stephanie Rennke; Brad Monash; Stephanie M Harman; Debbie S Sakai; Poonam Hosamani; Adeena Khan; Ian Chua; Eric Huynh; Lisa Shieh; Lijia Xie Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Jason C Ojeda; James A Colbert; Xinyi Lin; Graham T McMahon; Peter M Doubilet; Carol B Benson; Justina Wu; Joel T Katz; Maria A Yialamas Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Darcy A Reed; Rachel B Levine; Redonda G Miller; Bimal H Ashar; Eric B Bass; Tasha Rice; Joseph Cofrancesco Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kimberly McLaren; Julie Lord; Suzanne B Murray; Mitchell Levy; Paul Ciechanowski; Jesse Markman; Anna Ratzliff; Michael Grodesky; Deborah S Cowley Journal: Perspect Med Educ Date: 2013-04-23