Literature DB >> 16703619

Experimental analysis of lens-forming capacity in Xenopus borealis larvae.

Sergio Filoni1, Sergio Bernardini, Stefano M Cannata.   

Abstract

Previously, the only anuran amphibians known to have the capacity to regenerate a lens after lentectomy were Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis. This regeneration process occurs during the larval life through transdifferentiation of the outer cornea promoted by inductive factors produced by the retina and accumulated inside the vitreous chamber. However, the capacity of X. tropicalis to regenerate a lens is much lower than that of X. laevis. This study demonstrates that Xenopus borealis, a species more closely related to X. laevis than to X. tropicalis, is not able to regenerate a lens after lentectomy. Nevertheless, some morphological modifications corresponding to the first stages of lens regeneration in X. laevis were observed in the outer cornea of X. borealis. This suggested that in X borealis the regeneration process was blocked at early stages. Results from histological analysis of X. borealis and X. laevis lentectomized eyes and from implantation of outer cornea fragments into the vitreous and anterior chambers demonstrated that: (i) in X. borealis eye, the lens-forming competence in the outer cornea and inductive factors in the vitreous chamber are both present, (ii) no inhibiting factors are present in the anterior chamber, the environment where lens regeneration begins, (iii) the inability of X. borealis to regenerate a lens after lentectomy is due to an inhibiting action exerted by the inner cornea on the spreading of the retinal factor from the vitreous chamber towards the outer cornea. This mechanical inhibition is assured by two distinctive features of X. borealis eye in comparison with X. laevis eye: (i) a weaker and slower response to the retinal inducer by the outer cornea; (ii) a stronger and faster healing of the inner cornea. Unlike X. tropicalis and similar to X. laevis, in X. borealis the competence to respond to the retinal factor is not restricted to the corneal epithelium but also extends to the pericorneal epidermis. 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16703619     DOI: 10.1002/jez.a.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol        ISSN: 1548-8969


  7 in total

Review 1.  Diverse Evolutionary Origins and Mechanisms of Lens Regeneration.

Authors:  Jonathan J Henry; Paul W Hamilton
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  FGF signaling is required for lens regeneration in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Lisa Fukui; Jonathan J Henry
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.818

3.  Molecular and cellular aspects of amphibian lens regeneration.

Authors:  Jonathan J Henry; Panagiotis A Tsonis
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  The optic vesicle promotes cornea to lens transdifferentiation in larval Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Stefano M Cannata; Sergio Bernardini; Sergio Filoni; Cesare Gargioli
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Gene expression profiles of lens regeneration and development in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Erica L Malloch; Kimberly J Perry; Lisa Fukui; Verity R Johnson; Jason Wever; Caroline W Beck; Michael W King; Jonathan J Henry
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.780

6.  Methods for Examining Lens Regeneration in Xenopus.

Authors:  Jonathan J Henry; Kimberly J Perry; Paul W Hamilton
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2019-04-01

7.  The expression of αA- and βB1-crystallin during normal development and regeneration, and proteomic analysis for the regenerating lens in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Yongqing Zhao; Furong Ju; Yuanlin Zhao; Lei Wang; Zhenglong Sun; Mingxin Liu; Lan Gao
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.367

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.