BACKGROUND: The prognosis for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains unsatisfactory primarily because of the high incidence of recurrence. Therefore, optimal postremission therapy is a matter of vital concern. In particular, the clinical efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) should be clarified. METHODS: Rigorous criteria were used to select 7 studies of adult ALL that prospectively assessed overall survival (OS) using natural randomization based on donor availability combined with intention-to-treat analyses. The authors then performed a metaanalysis to evaluate the role of allogeneic HSCT. RESULTS: Seven studies that included 1274 patients were selected. A metaanalysis demonstrated that patients in the donor groups had significantly better survival than patients in the no-donor groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.02-1.63 [P = .037]). When only high-risk patients were included in the analysis, the superiority of the survival advantage was even greater (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.90 [P = .019]). A meta-regression analysis revealed that compliance with allogeneic HSCT showed a significant and positive correlation with survival (coefficient, 0.022; P < .01), suggesting that the greater the proportion of patients who actually received allogeneic HSCT, the better the survival of the donor group. No beneficial effects of autologous HSCT were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings demonstrated that allogeneic HSCT improves the outcome of adult patients with high-risk ALL. Although these analyses were based on abstracted data, the results indicated that allogeneic HSCT should be considered for such patients if a suitable donor is available. Copyright 2006 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: The prognosis for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains unsatisfactory primarily because of the high incidence of recurrence. Therefore, optimal postremission therapy is a matter of vital concern. In particular, the clinical efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) should be clarified. METHODS: Rigorous criteria were used to select 7 studies of adult ALL that prospectively assessed overall survival (OS) using natural randomization based on donor availability combined with intention-to-treat analyses. The authors then performed a metaanalysis to evaluate the role of allogeneic HSCT. RESULTS: Seven studies that included 1274 patients were selected. A metaanalysis demonstrated that patients in the donor groups had significantly better survival than patients in the no-donor groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.02-1.63 [P = .037]). When only high-risk patients were included in the analysis, the superiority of the survival advantage was even greater (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.90 [P = .019]). A meta-regression analysis revealed that compliance with allogeneic HSCT showed a significant and positive correlation with survival (coefficient, 0.022; P < .01), suggesting that the greater the proportion of patients who actually received allogeneic HSCT, the better the survival of the donor group. No beneficial effects of autologous HSCT were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings demonstrated that allogeneic HSCT improves the outcome of adult patients with high-risk ALL. Although these analyses were based on abstracted data, the results indicated that allogeneic HSCT should be considered for such patients if a suitable donor is available. Copyright 2006 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Steven Z Pavletic; Shaji Kumar; Mohamad Mohty; Marcos de Lima; James M Foran; Marcelo Pasquini; Mei-Jie Zhang; Sergio Giralt; Michael R Bishop; Daniel Weisdorf Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Eolia Brissot; Myriam Labopin; Marielle M Beckers; Gérard Socié; Alessandro Rambaldi; Liisa Volin; Jürgen Finke; Stig Lenhoff; Nicolaus Kröger; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Charles F Craddock; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Günhan Gürman; Nigel H Russell; Mahmoud Aljurf; Michael N Potter; Armon Nagler; Oliver Ottmann; Jan J Cornelissen; Jordi Esteve; Mohamad Mohty Journal: Haematologica Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Jenna D Goldberg; Alex Linker; Deborah Kuk; Ravin Ratan; Joseph Jurcic; Juliet N Barker; Hugo Castro-Malaspina; Sergio Giralt; Katharine Hsu; Ann A Jakubowski; Robert Jenq; Guenther Koehne; Esperanza B Papadopoulos; Marcel R M van den Brink; James W Young; Farid Boulad; Nancy A Kernan; Richard J O'Reilly; Susan E Prockop; Joachim Yahalom; Glenn Heller; Miguel-Angel Perales Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: N Kröger; M Bornhäuser; M Stelljes; U Pichlmeier; R Trenschel; C Schmid; R Arnold; H Martin; M Heinzelmann; C Wolschke; R G Meyer; W Bethge; G Kobbe; F Ayuk; N Gökbuget; D Hölzer; A Zander; D Beelen Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Bella Patel; Keiren E Kirkland; Richard Szydlo; Rachel M Pearce; Richard E Clark; Charles Craddock; Effie Liakopoulou; Adele K Fielding; Stephen Mackinnon; Eduardo Olavarria; Mike N Potter; Nigel H Russell; Bronwen E Shaw; Gordon Cook; Anthony H Goldstone; David I Marks Journal: Haematologica Date: 2009-07-31 Impact factor: 9.941