Literature DB >> 16703473

Psychometrics of the recovery process inventory.

Jeanette M Jerrell1, Victoria C Cousins, Katherine M Roberts.   

Abstract

The reliability and validity of the Recovery Process Inventory (RPI) were assessed in a statewide sample of 459 persons with severe mental illness from a public mental health system. Six factors were identified that reflect important aspects of the recovery process, have good internal consistency and fair to moderate test-retest reliability, and yield moderate to good convergent validity on the majority of subscales. The 22-item RPI performance across these dimensions and its comparability to the Recovery Assessment Scale and related instruments, e.g., empowerment, confidence, and healing, make it a potentially valuable tool in survey research regarding the process and outcomes of recovery among mental health consumers. Suggestions for its further research and development, and use of the scale in conjunction with the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program Adult Consumer Survey are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16703473     DOI: 10.1007/s11414-006-9031-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1094-3412            Impact factor:   1.505


  12 in total

1.  The reliability and validity of the SAS-SMI.

Authors:  K M Wieduwilt; J M Jerrell
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication.

Authors:  N Jacobson; D Greenley
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Some recovery processes in mutual-help groups for persons with mental illness; I: qualitative analysis of program materials and testimonies.

Authors:  Patrick W Corrigan; Joseph D Calabrese; Sarah E Diwan; Cornelius B Keogh; Lorraine Keck; Carol Mussey
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2002-08

4.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

Authors:  D T CAMPBELL; D W FISKE
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale.

Authors:  Patrick W Corrigan; Mark Salzer; Ruth O Ralph; Yvette Sangster; Lorraine Keck
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services.

Authors:  E S Rogers; J Chamberlin; M L Ellison; T Crean
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  How I perceive and manage my illness.

Authors:  E Leete
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  Recovery as a psychological construct.

Authors:  P W Corrigan; D Giffort; F Rashid; M Leary; I Okeke
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1999-06

9.  Discovering recovery.

Authors:  Gene Deegan
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2003

10.  Gender, premorbid social functioning, and long-term outcome in DSM-III schizophrenia.

Authors:  S E Childers; C M Harding
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.306

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Chances and problems of the recovery approach from a psychiatric viewpoint].

Authors:  G Dammann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Who benefits from peer support in psychiatric institutions?

Authors:  Franziska Rabenschlag; Holger Hoffmann; Antoinette Conca; Claudia Schusterschitz
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2012-06

3.  Cognitive-behavioural therapy for personal recovery of patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weiliang Wang; Yuqiu Zhou; Nannan Chai; Dongwei Liu
Journal:  Gen Psychiatr       Date:  2019-08-26

4.  Essential Elements That Contribute to the Recovery of Persons With Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Scoping Study.

Authors:  Atul Jaiswal; Karin Carmichael; Shikha Gupta; Tina Siemens; Pavlina Crowley; Alexandra Carlsson; Gord Unsworth; Terry Landry; Naomi Brown
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Measuring Mental Health Recovery: An Application of Rasch Modeling to the Consumer Recovery Measure.

Authors:  Kathryn Kd Lusczakoski; P Antonio Olmos-Gallo; William Milnor; Christopher J McKinney
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.505

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.