Literature DB >> 16702515

Result of a national audit of bariatric surgery performed at academic centers: a 2004 University HealthSystem Consortium Benchmarking Project.

Ninh T Nguyen1, Michael Silver, Malcolm Robinson, Bradley Needleman, Guilford Hartley, Robert Cooney, Robert Catalano, Jackie Dostal, Danny Sama, Jeanne Blankenship, Kathryn Burg, Edward Stemmer, Samuel E Wilson.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Bariatric surgery performed at US academic centers is safe and associated with low mortality.
DESIGN: Multi-institutional consecutive cohort study.
SETTING: Academic medical centers. PATIENTS AND
INTERVENTIONS: We audited the medical records from 40 consecutive bariatric surgery cases performed between October 1, 2003, and March 31, 2004, at each of the 29 institutions participating in the University HealthSystem Consortium Bariatric Surgery Benchmarking Project. All medical records that met inclusion criteria (patient age, >17 and <65 years; and body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters], 35-70) and exclusion criteria (previous bariatric surgery) were reviewed and data were collected on a standardized form. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic data, operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirement, complications, readmission, reoperation, and in-hospital and 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: Data from 1144 bariatric surgery cases were reviewed from 29 University HealthSystem Consortium institutions. The specific bariatric procedures included gastric bypass (91.7%), gastroplasty or gastric banding (8.2%), and biliopancreatic diversion (0.1%). For gastric bypass procedures (n = 1049), the mean patient age was 43 years and mean body mass index was 49; 76% of procedures were performed laparoscopically, with a conversion rate of 2.2%; the overall complication rate was 16%, with an anastomotic leakage rate of 1.6%; the 30-day readmission rate was 6.6%; and the 30-day mortality rate was 0.4%. For restrictive procedures (n = 94), the mean patient age was 45 years and mean body mass index was 45; 92% of procedures were performed laparoscopically with no conversion; the overall complication rate was 3.2%; the 30-day readmission rate was 4.3%; and the 30-day mortality rate was 0%.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of the 2004 University HealthSystem Consortium Bariatric Surgery Benchmarking Project, the risk for death within 30 days after bariatric surgery at academic centers is less than 1%. In addition, the practice of bariatric surgery at these centers has shifted from open surgery to predominately laparoscopic surgery. These quality-controlled outcome data can be used as a benchmark for the practice of bariatric surgery at most US hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16702515     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.141.5.445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  26 in total

1.  Bariatric surgery outcomes in patients aged 65 years and older at an American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence.

Authors:  Kathryn L O'Keefe; Paul R Kemmeter; Kimberly D Kemmeter
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Laparoscopic management of chronic pouch fistula after a leak following staple line dehiscence after laparoscopic revision of a dilated pouch following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Olga N Tucker; Samuel Szomstein; Raul Rosenthal
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Mortality and hospital stay after bariatric surgery in 2,167 patients: influence of the surgeon expertise.

Authors:  Silvana Márcia Bruschi Kelles; Sandhi Maria Barreto; Henrique Leonardo Guerra
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Quality of life after bariatric surgery--a comparative study of laparoscopic banding vs. bypass.

Authors:  Markus K Müller; Christa Wenger; Marc Schiesser; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Markus Weber
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Short-term morbidity and mortality after open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. A population-based study from Sweden.

Authors:  Richard Marsk; Per Tynelius; Finn Rasmussen; Jacob Freedman
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  One-year readmission rates at a high volume bariatric surgery center: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic gastric bypass, and vertical banded gastroplasty-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  John Saunders; Garth H Ballantyne; Scott Belsley; Daniel J Stephens; Amit Trivedi; Douglas R Ewing; Vincent A Iannace; Rafael F Capella; Annette Wasileweski; Steven Moran; Hans J Schmidt
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 7.  A review of unmet needs in obesity management.

Authors:  N Nguyen; J K Champion; J Ponce; B Quebbemann; E Patterson; B Pham; W Raum; J N Buchwald; G Segato; F Favretti
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  The impact of socioeconomic factors on patient preparation for bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Lisa M Balduf; Geoffrey P Kohn; Joseph A Galanko; Timothy M Farrell
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Early experience with the Incisionless Operating Platform™ (IOP) for the treatment of obesity : the Primary Obesity Surgery Endolumenal (POSE) procedure.

Authors:  J C Espinós; R Turró; A Mata; M Cruz; M da Costa; V Villa; J N Buchwald; J Turró
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Standardization of the fully stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity reduces early immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality: a single center study on 2606 patients.

Authors:  Bruno Dillemans; Nasser Sakran; Sebastiaan Van Cauwenberge; Thibault Sablon; Barbara Defoort; Els Van Dessel; Faki Akin; Nathalie Moreels; Sebastiaan Lambert; Jan Mulier; Ravindra Date; Michel Vandelanotte; Tom Feryn; Luc Proot
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.