Literature DB >> 16702494

Randomized controlled trial of adjuvant oral dexamethasone pulse therapy in pemphigus vulgaris: PEMPULS trial.

Leon F Mentink1, Maria W Mackenzie, Gábor G Tóth, Marianne Laseur, Frank P G Lambert, Nic J G M Veeger, Giuseppe Cianchini, Milos D Pavlovic, Marcel F Jonkman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the therapeutic effect of adjuvant dexamethasone pulse therapy when given in addition to conventional treatment of pemphigus vulgaris.
DESIGN: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
SETTING: International European, multicenter outpatient and inpatient study. PATIENTS: Of the 20 enrolled patients, 11 were randomized to the dexamethasone pulse (DP) group and 9 to the placebo pulse (PP) group.
INTERVENTIONS: Oral dexamethasone in 300-mg pulses or PPs 3 days per month. During the intervention, the DP and PP groups received conventional treatment with prednisolone, 80 mg/d, which was tapered across 19 weeks, and azathioprine sodium, 3 mg/kg per day, until the end of the study. Monthly pulses were continued until prednisolone treatment was tapered to 0 mg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of patients in remission, time to and duration of remission, cumulative prednisolone dose, and occurrence of adverse events during 1 year of follow-up.
RESULTS: Eight of the 11 DP-treated patients and all 9 PP-treated patients achieved remission. Mean time to remission was 173 days with DP and 176 days with PP. The mean duration of remission within the first year was 151 days for DP and 141 days for PP. Mean cumulative prednisolone dose was 5300 mg for DP and 4882 mg for PP. Weight gain (>5% of baseline) occurred in 8 DP-treated patients compared with 1 PP-treated patient (P<.01). We found no statistically significant difference (P>.05) of an adjuvant effect of DP on remission of pemphigus vulgaris.
CONCLUSION: In patients with new pemphigus vulgaris disease activity, there was no benefit of oral DP therapy given in addition to conventional treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00127764.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16702494     DOI: 10.1001/archderm.142.5.570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pemphigus: a brief review.

Authors:  Richard W Groves
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 2.  Pemphigus vulgaris: an evidence-based treatment update.

Authors:  Cathy Y Zhao; Dedee F Murrell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Pemphigus: Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Dario Didona; Roberto Maglie; Rüdiger Eming; Michael Hertl
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 4.  Development of outcome measures for autoimmune dermatoses.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gaines; Victoria P Werth
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 5.  Management of pemphigus vulgaris: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Stamatis Gregoriou; Ourania Efthymiou; Christina Stefanaki; Dimitris Rigopoulos
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2015-10-21

6.  Evaluation of cases of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus from a reference service in Pará state, Brazil.

Authors:  Carla Andréa Avelar Pires; Viviane Brito Viana; Fernando Costa Araújo; Silvia Ferreira Rodrigues Müller; Miguel Saraty de Oliveira; Francisca Regina Oliveira Carneiro
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.896

Review 7.  Management of Pemphigus Vulgaris.

Authors:  Mimansa Cholera; Nita Chainani-Wu
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 8.  Emerging treatment options for the management of pemphigus vulgaris.

Authors:  Khalaf Kridin
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.423

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.