Literature DB >> 16701621

Evaluation of support materials for the immobilization of sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea.

A J Silva1, J S Hirasawa, M B Varesche, E Foresti, M Zaiat.   

Abstract

This paper reports on the adhesion of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and methanogenic archaea on polyurethane foam (PU), vegetal carbon (VC), low-density polyethylene (PE) and alumina-based ceramics (CE). Anaerobic differential reactors fed with a sulfate-rich synthetic wastewater were used to evaluate the formation of a biofilm. The PU presented the highest specific biomass concentration throughout the experiment, achieving 872 mg TVS/g support, while 84 mg TVS/g support was the maximum value obtained for the other materials. FISH results showed that bacterial cells rather than archaeal cells were predominant on the biofilms. These cells, detected with EUB338 probe, accounted for 76.2% (+/-1.6%), 79.7% (+/-1.3%), 84.4% (+/-1.4%) and 60.2% (+/-1.0%) in PU, VC, PE and CE, respectively, of the 4'6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained cells. From these percentages, 44.8% (+/-2.1%), 55.4% (+/-1.2%), 32.7% (+/-1.4%) and 18.1% (+/-1.1%), respectively, represented the SRB group. Archaeal cells, detected with ARC915 probe, accounted for 33.1% (+/-1.6%), 25.4% (+/-1.3%), 22.6% (+/-1.1%) and 41.9% (+/-1.0%) in PU, VC, PE and CE, respectively, of the DAPI-stained cells. Sulfate reduction efficiencies of 39% and 45% and mean chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiencies of 86% and 90% were achieved for PU and VC, respectively. The other two supports, PE and CE, provided mean COD removal efficiencies of 84% and 86%, respectively. However, no sulfate reduction was observed with these supports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16701621     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2005.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  6 in total

1.  Acetotrophic sulfate-reducing consortia develop active biofilms on zeolite and glass beads in batch cultures at initial pH 3.

Authors:  Nohemi Campos-Quevedo; Tonatiuh Moreno-Perlin; Elías Razo-Flores; Alfons J M Stams; Lourdes B Celis; Irene Sánchez-Andrea
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Characterization of sulfate-reducing bacteria dominated surface communities during start-up of a down-flow fluidized bed reactor.

Authors:  Lourdes B Celis; Denys Villa-Gómez; Angel G Alpuche-Solís; B Otto Ortega-Morales; Elías Razo-Flores
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Microbial Characterization of Methanogenic and Iron-reducing Consortium in Reactors with Polychlorinated Biphenyls.

Authors:  Mara R de Lima E Silva; Regiane C Correa; Isabel K Sakamoto; Maria B A Varesche
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Evaluation of bacterial diversity recovered from petroleum samples using different physical matrices.

Authors:  Bruna Martins Dellagnezze; Suzan Pantaroto de Vasconcellos; Itamar Soares de Melo; Eugênio Vaz Dos Santos Neto; Valéria Maia de Oliveira
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 5.  Polymeric Materials Used for Immobilisation of Bacteria for the Bioremediation of Contaminants in Water.

Authors:  Dmitriy Berillo; Areej Al-Jwaid; Jonathan Caplin
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  Organic matter removal in a simultaneous nitrification-denitrification process using fixed-film system.

Authors:  P González-Tineo; A Aguilar; A Reynoso; U Durán; M Garzón-Zúñiga; E Meza-Escalante; L Álvarez; D Serrano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.