Literature DB >> 16701527

Myristic acid supports the immediate inhibitory effect of lauric acid on ruminal methanogens and methane release.

Carla R Soliva1, Leo Meile, Ida K Hindrichsen, Michael Kreuzer, Andrea Machmüller.   

Abstract

Two in vitro experiments were carried out with the Hohenheim gas test (HGT) apparatus in order to investigate dose-dependent effects and interactions of non-esterified lauric acid (C(12)) and myristic acid (C(14)) given either individually or in mixture on ruminal methanogens and methanogenesis. Special emphasis was also put on the relationship between effects on methane formation and methanogenic counts. The in vitro incubations were conducted in 10mL ruminal fluid and 20mL buffer solution and lasted for 24h. In the first experiment, 14 levels of C(12), C(14) and stearic acid (C(18); control) were supplied each in increasing steps of 2.5mg covering the range from 0 to 32.5mg. In the second experiment, dosages ranging from 2.5 to 30mg C(12) were supplemented in steps of 2.5mg either without or with 10, 20 or 30mg of C(14). Counts of total Archaea and individual methanogenic orders were determined by the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique using 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes. In experiment 1, a methane-suppressing effect of more than 80% was achieved with a supply of 30mg C(12), whereas C(14) and C(18) had no effect. Incubation liquid counts of total Archaea and individual methanogenic orders (Methanococcales, Methanosarcinales, Methanomicrobiales and Methanobacteriales) exponentially decreased as a response to C(12) and C(14) to about the same degree (up to 90%) and, to a lesser extent, by C(18). The proportions of the orders of total methanogenic population were not altered by any of the fatty acids. In experiment 2, an additional supply of 10 or 20mg of C(14) supported the suppression of methanogenesis and methanogens by C(12) synergistically. Supplementing 30mg instead of 20mg of C(14) did not further increase the efficacy of C(12) in suppressing methane formation and methanogens. The study illustrated the advantage of using mixtures of C(12) and C(14) in ruminant nutrition to suppress methane emission since mixtures will reduce the amounts of the less palatable C(12) required in feed.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 16701527     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2004.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  10 in total

Review 1.  The use of molecular techniques based on ribosomal RNA and DNA for rumen microbial ecosystem studies: a review.

Authors:  Weidong Deng; Dongmei Xi; Huaming Mao; Metha Wanapat
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 2.  Enumeration of methanogens with a focus on fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Sumit Singh Dagar; Ashok Kumar Mohanty; Sunil Kumar Sirohi; Monica Puniya; Ramesh C Kuhad; K P S Sangu; Gareth Wyn Griffith; Anil Kumar Puniya
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-04-08

3.  Effects of reductive acetogenic bacteria and lauric acid on in vivo ruminal fermentation, microbial populations, and methane mitigation in Hanwoo steers in South Korea.

Authors:  Seon-Ho Kim; Lovelia L Mamuad; Yeon-Jae Choi; Ha Guyn Sung; Kwang-Keun Cho; Sang Suk Lee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Analysis of methanogen diversity in the rumen using temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis: identification of uncultured methanogens.

Authors:  Matthew J Nicholson; Paul N Evans; Keith N Joblin
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Activity and viability of methanogens in anaerobic digestion of unsaturated and saturated long-chain fatty acids.

Authors:  Diana Z Sousa; Andreia F Salvador; Juliana Ramos; Ana P Guedes; Sónia Barbosa; Alfons J M Stams; M Madalena Alves; M Alcina Pereira
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages.

Authors:  Melanie B Lengowski; Karin H R Zuber; Maren Witzig; Jens Möhring; Jeannette Boguhn; Markus Rodehutscord
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Rumen methanogens and mitigation of methane emission by anti-methanogenic compounds and substances.

Authors:  Amlan Patra; Tansol Park; Minseok Kim; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-26

8.  The effect of saturated fatty acids on methanogenesis and cell viability of Methanobrevibacter ruminantium.

Authors:  Xuan Zhou; Leo Meile; Michael Kreuzer; Johanna O Zeitz
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.273

Review 9.  The Role of Ciliate Protozoa in the Rumen.

Authors:  Charles J Newbold; Gabriel de la Fuente; Alejandro Belanche; Eva Ramos-Morales; Neil R McEwan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Effect of substituting soybean meal with euglena (Euglena gracilis) on methane emission and nitrogen efficiency in sheep.

Authors:  Ashagrie Aemiro; Shota Watanabe; Kengo Suzuki; Masaaki Hanada; Kazutaka Umetsu; Takehiro Nishida
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 1.749

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.