Literature DB >> 16701346

Critical science gaps impede use of no-take fishery reserves.

Peter F Sale1, Robert K Cowen, Bret S Danilowicz, Geoffrey P Jones, Jacob P Kritzer, Kenyon C Lindeman, Serge Planes, Nicholas V C Polunin, Garry R Russ, Yvonne J Sadovy, Robert S Steneck.   

Abstract

As well as serving valuable biodiversity conservation roles, functioning no-take fishery reserves protect a portion of the fishery stock as insurance against future over-fishing. So long as there is adequate compliance by the fishing community, it is likely that they will also sustain and even enhance fishery yields in the surrounding area. However, there are significant gaps in scientific knowledge that must be filled if no-take reserves are to be used effectively as fishery management tools. Unfortunately, these gaps are being glossed over by some uncritical advocacy. Here, we review the science, identify the most crucial gaps, and suggest ways to fill them, so that a promising management tool can help meet the growing challenges faced by coastal marine fisheries.

Year:  2004        PMID: 16701346     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  92 in total

1.  Probability of successful larval dispersal declines fivefold over 1 km in a coral reef fish.

Authors:  Peter M Buston; Geoffrey P Jones; Serge Planes; Simon R Thorrold
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Identifying critical regions in small-world marine metapopulations.

Authors:  James R Watson; David A Siegel; Bruce E Kendall; Satoshi Mitarai; Andrew Rassweiller; Steven D Gaines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Patterns, causes, and consequences of marine larval dispersal.

Authors:  Cassidy C D'Aloia; Steven M Bogdanowicz; Robin K Francis; John E Majoris; Richard G Harrison; Peter M Buston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The good, the bad and the ugly of marine reserves for fishery yields.

Authors:  Giulio A De Leo; Fiorenza Micheli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Determining the feasibility of establishing new multiple-use marine protected areas in Chile.

Authors:  Felipe Vásquez-Lavín; Jeanne W Simon; Ximena Paz-Lerdón
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  Transboundary socio-ecological effects of a Marine Protected Area in the Southwest Atlantic.

Authors:  Priscila F M Lopes; Renato A M Silvano; Vinicius A Nora; Alpina Begossi
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Estuarine recruitment of a marine goby reconstructed with an isotopic clock.

Authors:  Jef Guelinckx; Joachim Maes; Bram Geysen; Frans Ollevier
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Global patterns in marine dispersal estimates: the influence of geography, taxonomic category and life history.

Authors:  Ian R Bradbury; Benjamin Laurel; Paul V R Snelgrove; Paul Bentzen; Steven E Campana
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Connectivity dominates larval replenishment in a coastal reef fish metapopulation.

Authors:  Pablo Saenz-Agudelo; Geoffrey P Jones; Simon R Thorrold; Serge Planes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Differential movement and movement bias models for marine protected areas.

Authors:  Jessica Langebrake; Louise Riotte-Lambert; Craig W Osenberg; Patrick De Leenheer
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 2.259

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.