Literature DB >> 16701337

What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?

Roosa Leimu1, Julia Koricheva.   

Abstract

Citation frequencies of scientific articles are increasingly used for academic evaluation in various disciplines, including ecology. However, the factors affecting citation rates have not been extensively studied. Here, we examine the association between the citation frequency of ecological articles and various characteristics of journals, articles and authors. Our analysis shows that the annual citation rates of ecological papers are affected by the direction of the study outcome with respect to the hypothesis tested (supportive versus unsupportive evidence), by article length, by the number of authors, and by their country and university of affiliation. These results cast doubt on the validity of using citation counts as an objective and unbiased tool for academic evaluation in ecology.

Year:  2005        PMID: 16701337     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  31 in total

1.  Reaching out for scientific legacy: how to define authorship in academic publishing.

Authors:  Sven Thatje
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-01-23

2.  Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cynthia Lokker; K Ann McKibbon; R James McKinlay; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-21

Review 3.  A review of evidence for the claim that children are sleeping less than in the past.

Authors:  Lisa Matricciani; Tim Olds; Marie Williams
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Citation marketing and networking.

Authors:  Ivan Couée
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-06-09

Review 5.  The Top 100 Most-Cited Publications in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Neha Singh
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 1.033

6.  Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Control of Pteridium aquilinum: meta-analysis of a multi-site study in the UK.

Authors:  Gavin Stewart; Emma Cox; Mike Le Duc; Robin Pakeman; Andrew Pullin; Rob Marrs
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker; Nina Stoletzki
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Concentration of the most-cited papers in the scientific literature: analysis of journal ecosystems.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Gerlind Wallon; Anna Ledin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.