Literature DB >> 16701067

Evaluation of a recombinant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting Chlamydophila psittaci antibodies in turkey sera.

Kristel Verminnen1, Marnix Van Loock, Hafez Mohamed Hafez, Richard Ducatelle, Freddy Haesebrouck, Daisy Vanrompay.   

Abstract

Chlamydophila psittaci (formerly Chlamydia psittaci) is one of the major pathogens associated with turkey respiratory disease. Devastating outbreaks with high mortality rates, similar to those of 1950 to 1970 in the USA occasionally occur, but respiratory signs without or with low mortality mostly characterize outbreaks now a day. Accurate diagnostic methods should be made available. The present study examined the sensitivity and specificity of a recombinant ELISA (rMOMP ELISA) for detecting Cp. psittaci major outer membrane specific antibodies in turkey sera. Test results were compared to those of immunoblotting and of a competitive ELISA (Chlamydia-psittaci-AK-EIA, Röhm Pharma, Germany) and an indirect ELISA (LPS/LGP) detecting antibodies to the lipopolysaccharide/lipoglycoprotein complex. The rMOMP ELISA was most sensitive as determined on serial dilutions of positive control sera originating from experimentally infected SPF turkeys. The competitive ELISA gave false positives since three negative controls reacted positive. For conventional sera, the sensitivities of the competitive ELISA, immunoblotting and the indirect ELISA were found to be 99.4, 93.1 and 82.2%, respectively, as compared to the rMOMP ELISA (100%). The specificities of the rMOMP ELISA, immunoblotting and the indirect ELISA were found to be 100% while the specificity of the competitive ELISA was only 2.7%. The rMOMP ELISA was chosen to compare the prevalence of chlamydiosis in 2002 with the one from 1992. In 2002, 188 on 200 (94%) turkey sera reacted positive compared to 175 on 200 (87.5%) in 1992 and like 10 years ago all examined farms were seropositive at slaughter. Interestingly, Belgian as well as French farms were seropositive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16701067     DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2006023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res        ISSN: 0928-4249            Impact factor:   3.683


  5 in total

1.  Chlamydophila psittaci zoonotic risk assessment in a chicken and turkey slaughterhouse.

Authors:  V Dickx; T Geens; T Deschuyffeleer; L Tyberghien; T Harkinezhad; D S A Beeckman; L Braeckman; D Vanrompay
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of a Chlamydophila psittaci infection diagnostic platform for zoonotic risk assessment.

Authors:  Kristel Verminnen; Barbara Duquenne; David De Keukeleire; Birgitta Duim; Yvonne Pannekoek; Lutgart Braeckman; Daisy Vanrompay
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Chlamydiaceae infections in pig.

Authors:  Katelijn Schautteet; Daisy Vanrompay
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Analysis of Polymorphic Membrane Protein Expression in Cultured Cells Identifies PmpA and PmpH of Chlamydia psittaci as Candidate Factors in Pathogenesis and Immunity to Infection.

Authors:  Sarah Van Lent; Winnok H De Vos; Heather Huot Creasy; Patricia X Marques; Jacques Ravel; Daisy Vanrompay; Patrik Bavoil; Ru-Ching Hsia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A comprehensive review on avian chlamydiosis: a neglected zoonotic disease.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Ravichandran; Subbaiyan Anbazhagan; Kumaragurubaran Karthik; Madesh Angappan; Balusamy Dhayananth
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 1.559

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.