Literature DB >> 16700071

Spermatocyte responses in vitro to induced DNA damage.

Shannon Matulis1, Mary Ann Handel.   

Abstract

Spermatocytes normally sustain many meiotically induced double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) early in meiotic prophase; in autosomal chromatin, these are repaired by initiation of meiotic homologous-recombination processes. Little is known about how spermatocytes respond to environmentally induced DNA damage after recombination-related DSBs have been repaired. The experiments described here tested the hypothesis that, even though actively completing meiotic recombination, pachytene spermatocytes cultured in the absence of testicular somatic cells initiate appropriate chromatin remodeling and cell-cycle responses to environmentally induced DNA damage. Two DNA-damaging agents were employed for in vitro treatment of pachytene spermatocytes: gamma-irradiation and etoposide, a topoisomerase II (TOP2) inhibitor that results in persistent unligated DSBs. Chromatin modifications associated with DSBs were monitored after exposure by labeling surface-spread chromatin with antibodies against RAD51 (which recognizes DSBs) and the phosphorylated variant of histone H2AFX (herein designated by its commonly used symbol, H2AX), gammaH2AX (which modifies chromatin associated with DSBs). Both gammaH2AX and RAD51 were rapidly recruited to irradiation- or etoposide-damaged chromatin. These chromatin modifications imply that spermatocytes recruit active DNA damage responses, even after recombination is substantially completed. Furthermore, irradiation-induced DNA damage inhibited okadaic acid-induced progression of spermatocytes from meiotic prophase to metaphase I (MI), implying efficacy of DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms. Apoptotic responses of spermatocytes with DNA damage differed, with an increase in frequency of early apoptotic spermatocytes after etoposide treatment, but not following irradiation. Taken together, these results demonstrate modification of pachytene spermatocyte chromatin and inhibition of meiotic progress after DNA damage by mechanisms that may ensure gametic genetic integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16700071     DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  7 in total

1.  Cohesin removal precedes topoisomerase IIα-dependent decatenation at centromeres in male mammalian meiosis II.

Authors:  Rocío Gómez; Alberto Viera; Inés Berenguer; Elena Llano; Alberto M Pendás; José Luis Barbero; Akihiko Kikuchi; José A Suja
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Genetic mechanisms of formation of radiation-induced instability of the genome and its transgenerational effects in the descendants of chronically irradiated individuals of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Elena Yushkova
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Protective role of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on human sperm exposed to etoposide.

Authors:  João Baetas; Ana Rabaça; Ana Gonçalves; Alberto Barros; Mário Sousa; Rosália Sá
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2019-02-07

4.  SPO11-independent DNA repair foci and their role in meiotic silencing.

Authors:  Fabrizia Carofiglio; Akiko Inagaki; Sandra de Vries; Evelyne Wassenaar; Sam Schoenmakers; Christie Vermeulen; Wiggert A van Cappellen; Esther Sleddens-Linkels; J Anton Grootegoed; Hein P J Te Riele; Bernard de Massy; Willy M Baarends
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  New insights into germ cell migration and survival/apoptosis in spermatogenesis: Lessons from CD147.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Kin Lam Fok; Xiaohua Jiang; Hsiao Chang Chan
Journal:  Spermatogenesis       Date:  2012-10-01

6.  Mouse pachytene checkpoint 2 (trip13) is required for completing meiotic recombination but not synapsis.

Authors:  Xin Chenglin Li; Xin Li; John C Schimenti
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Transition from a meiotic to a somatic-like DNA damage response during the pachytene stage in mouse meiosis.

Authors:  Andrea Enguita-Marruedo; Marta Martín-Ruiz; Eva García; Ana Gil-Fernández; María Teresa Parra; Alberto Viera; Julio S Rufas; Jesús Page
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.917

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.