Literature DB >> 16699964

The embryo rescue case.

S Matthew Liao1.   

Abstract

In the debate regarding the moral status of human embryos, the Embryo Rescue Case has been used to suggest that embryos are not rightholders. This case is premised on the idea that in a situation where one has a choice between saving some number of embryos or a child, it seems wrong to save the embryos and not the child. If so, it seems that embryos cannot be rightholders. In this paper, I argue that the Embryo Rescue Case does not independently show that embryos are not rightholders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16699964     DOI: 10.1007/s11017-005-1390-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  3 in total

1.  Why abortion is immoral.

Authors:  Don Marquis
Journal:  J Philos       Date:  1989-04

2.  The ethical implications of human cloning.

Authors:  Michael J Sandel
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.416

3.  A French homunculus in a Tennessee court.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Destroying unwanted embryos in research. Talking Point on morality and human embryo research.

Authors:  Thomas Douglas; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Are those who subscribe to the view that early embryos are persons irrational and inconsistent? A reply to Brock.

Authors:  Jan Deckers
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.