Literature DB >> 16699114

Variations in meat pH of beef bulls in relation to conditions of transfer to slaughter and previous history of the animals.

L Mounier1, H Dubroeucq, S Andanson, I Veissier.   

Abstract

Animals are subjected to various events that cause physical exhaustion and psychological stress during transfer to slaughter. This can lead to defective meat quality. Some animals may be better able to withstand the stress of transfer, depending on their previous experience of transport and on their finishing conditions (mixing, farmers' attitudes). The objective of this study was to assess the impact of 1) the conditions of transfer to slaughter (including duration of the journey, waiting time at lairage, etc.); and 2) the bulls' previous history (including experience in transport, mixing during finishing, and the farmers' attitudes) on the reactions of bulls to transfer and on their meat quality. We conducted a survey in commercial conditions. The history of the bulls and the facilities on the farms were noted; farmers were questioned on their attitudes; the bulls' reactions to loading into and unloading from the truck were observed; journey-related data were collected; and cortisol concentration at slaughter and the pH of the LM and the rectus abdominis were measured. Our study confirmed that certain physical factors associated with transport can increase stress and limit the decline of meat pH. These factors include the absence of loading facilities on the farm, transport on a warm day, or a short waiting time at lairage. Social aspects also played a role; the presence of bulls from the same finishing group limited stress and improved the pH decline. Events and management before transfer were also of importance; the farmer awareness of the sensitivity of bulls to humans or to feeding schedules but the absence of a positive attitude toward close contacts with bulls were all likely to limit stress or its consequences on meat pH. Although these results need to be confirmed in controlled experiments, they suggest that good management of beef bulls before and during transfer is essential to meat quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16699114     DOI: 10.2527/2006.8461567x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Quality Assessment of Longissimus and Semitendinosus Muscles from Beef Cattle Subjected to Non-penetrative and Penetrative Percussive Stunning Methods.

Authors:  A Q Sazili; B Norbaiyah; I Zulkifli; Y M Goh; M Lotfi; A H Small
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.509

2.  Risk assessment of sheep welfare at small-scale slaughter in Nordic countries, comparing with large-scale slaughter.

Authors:  Jan Hultgren; Bo Algers; Sophie Atkinson; Kristian Ellingsen; Sofia Eriksson; Kjartan Hreinsson; Lotta Nordensten; Heidi Valtari; Cecilie Marie Mejdell
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  Analysis of Stress Indicators for Evaluation of Animal Welfare and Meat Quality in Traditional and Jewish Slaughtering.

Authors:  Giancarlo Bozzo; Roberta Barrasso; Patrizia Marchetti; Rocco Roma; Giorgio Samoilis; Giuseppina Tantillo; Edmondo Ceci
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Effect of Finishing Diet and Lairage Time on Steers Welfare in Uruguay.

Authors:  Marcia Del Campo Gigena; Juan Manuel Soares de Lima; Gustavo Brito; Xavier Manteca; Pilar Hernández; Fabio Montossi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Bruising in slaughter cattle and its relationship with creatine kinase levels and beef quality as affected by animal related factors.

Authors:  T Mpakama; A Y Chulayo; V Muchenje
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.509

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.