Literature DB >> 16698097

Anatomy changes in radiotherapy detected using portal imaging.

Leah N McDermott1, Markus Wendling, Jan-Jakob Sonke, Marcel van Herk, Ben J Mijnheer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Localisation images normally acquired to verify patient positioning also contain information about the patient's internal anatomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the anatomical changes observed in localisation images and examples of dosimetric consequences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Localisation images were obtained weekly prior to radiotherapy with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). A series of 'difference images' was created by subtracting the first localisation image from that of subsequent fractions. Images from 81 lung, 40 head and neck and 34 prostate cancer patients were classified according to the changes observed. Changes were considered relevant if the average pixel value over an area of at least 1cm(2) differed by more than 5%, to allow for variations in linac output and EPID signal. Two patients were selected to illustrate the dosimetric effects of relevant changes. Their plans were re-calculated with repeat CT scans acquired after 4 weeks of treatment and compared with the difference images of the corresponding days.
RESULTS: Progressive changes were detected for 57% of lung and 37% of head and neck cancer patients studied. Random changes were observed in 37% of lung, 28% of head and neck and 82% of prostate cancer patients. For a lung case, an increase of 10.0% in EPID dose due to tumour shrinkage corresponded to an increase of 9.8% in mean lung dose. Gas pockets in the rectum region of the prostate case increased the EPID dose by 6.3%, and resulted in a decrease of the minimum dose to the planning target volume of 26.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Difference images are an efficient means of qualitatively detecting anatomical changes for various treatment sites in clinical practice. They can be used to identify changes for a particular patient, to indicate if the dose delivered to the patient would differ from planning and to detect if there is a need for re-planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16698097     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  7 in total

1.  Adaptive/nonadaptive proton radiation planning and outcomes in a phase II trial for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Eugene J Koay; David Lege; Radhe Mohan; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox; Joe Y Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  The effect of significant tumor reduction on the dose distribution in intensity modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a case study.

Authors:  James Mechalakos; Nancy Lee; Margie Hunt; C Clifton Ling; Howard I Amols
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 1.482

3.  Impact of body-mass factors on setup displacement in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy using daily on-line image guidance.

Authors:  Yo-Liang Lai; Shih-Neng Yang; Ji-An Liang; Yao-Ching Wang; Chun-Yen Yu; Ching-Hsiung Su; Shang-Wen Chen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Feasibility of portal dosimetry for flattening filter-free radiotherapy.

Authors:  Robert W Chuter; Philip A Rixham; Steve J Weston; Vivian P Cosgrove
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Optimization of treatment planning workflow and tumor coverage during daily adaptive magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Sven Olberg; Olga Green; Bin Cai; Deshan Yang; Vivian Rodriguez; Hao Zhang; Jin Sung Kim; Parag J Parikh; Sasa Mutic; Justin C Park
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  The effect of respiratory motion on electronic portal imaging device dosimetry.

Authors:  Andrew L Fielding; Jessica Benitez Mendieta; Sarah Maxwell; Catherine Jones
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Toward adaptive radiotherapy for lung patients: feasibility study on deforming planning CT to CBCT to assess the impact of anatomical changes on dosimetry.

Authors:  A J Cole; C Veiga; U Johnson; D D'Souza; N K Lalli; J R McClelland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.