Literature DB >> 16698051

Imitation during phoneme production.

Maurizio Gentilucci1, Paolo Bernardis.   

Abstract

Does listening to and observing the speaking interlocutor influence phoneme production? In two experiments female participants were required to recognize and, then, to repeat the string-of-phonemes /aba/ presented by actors visually, acoustically and audiovisually. In experiment 1 a male actor presented the string-of-phonemes and the participants' lip kinematics and voice spectra were compared with those of a reading control condition. In experiment 2 female and male actors presented the string-of-phonemes and the lip kinematics and the voice spectra of the participants' responses to the male actors were compared with those to the female actors (control condition). In both experiments 1 and 2, the lip kinematics in the visual presentations and the voice spectra in the acoustical presentations changed in the comparison with the control conditions approaching the male actors' values, which were different from those of the female participants and actors. The variation in lip kinematics induced changes also in voice formants but only in the visual presentation. The data suggest that both features of the lip kinematics and of the voice spectra tend to be automatically imitated when repeating a string-of-phonemes presented by a visible and/or audible speaking interlocutor. The use of imitation, in place of the usual lip kinematics and vocal features, suggests an automatic and unconscious tendency of the perceiver to interact closely with the interlocutor. This is in accordance with the idea that resonant circuits are activated by the activity of the mirror system, which relates observation to execution of arm and mouth gestures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16698051     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  11 in total

1.  Direct and octave-shifted pitch matching during nonword imitations in men, women, and children.

Authors:  Beate Peter; Bronsyn Foster; Heather Haas; Kyle Middleton; Kiersten McKibben
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Visual influences on interactive speech alignment.

Authors:  James W Dias; Lawrence D Rosenblum
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Is speech alignment to talkers or tasks?

Authors:  Rachel M Miller; Kauyumari Sanchez; Lawrence D Rosenblum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.

Authors:  Matthew Lehet; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25

5.  Prediction and imitation in speech.

Authors:  Chiara Gambi; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-21

6.  Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task.

Authors:  Abby Walker; Kathryn Campbell-Kibler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-12

7.  Measuring phonetic convergence in speech production.

Authors:  Jennifer S Pardo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-27

8.  Auditory perception bias in speech imitation.

Authors:  Marie Postma-Nilsenová; Eric Postma
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-05

9.  Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds.

Authors:  Guillaume Lemaitre; Olivier Houix; Frédéric Voisin; Nicolas Misdariis; Patrick Susini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Converging toward a common speech code: imitative and perceptuo-motor recalibration processes in speech production.

Authors:  Marc Sato; Krystyna Grabski; Maëva Garnier; Lionel Granjon; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Noël Nguyen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.