Literature DB >> 16697864

Acute integrity of closure for partial nephrectomy: comparison of 7 agents in a hypertensive porcine model.

William K Johnston1, Kristy M Kelel, Brent K Hollenbeck, Stephanie Daignault, J Stuart Wolf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the acute effectiveness of closure after partial nephrectomy of 7 techniques in a large hypertensive porcine model using shallow and deep resections to approximate clinical situations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Open surgical partial nephrectomy with hilar clamping was performed in pigs weighing 150 to 200 lbs, including small-a quarter length and a quarter width of kidney, medium-a third length and a third width of kidney, and into the renal sinus and up to the collecting system, and large-lower pole heminephrectomy at the renal sinus. Seven agents were compared after a single application, namely thrombin/collagen granules, polyethylene glycol hydrogel, fibrin glue, thrombin/gelatin granules, cyanoacrylate glue, fibrin glue/gelatin sponge and sutured bolster. Failure and success were determined by the presence or absence of bleeding, respectively, after unclamping and by an increase in SBP to 100 and then to 200 mm Hg with dopamine infusion.
RESULTS: Of 70 partial nephrectomies the success rates were 33% and 14% for thrombin/collagen granules, and 67% and 0% for polyethylene glycol hydrogel in small and medium resections; 100%, 71% and 0% for fibrin glue, and 100%, 86% and 0% for thrombin/gelatin granules in small, medium and large resections; and 67% and 80% for cyanoacrylate glue, 100% and 20% for fibrin glue/gelatin sponge, and 100% for sutured bolster in medium and large resections, respectively. Of the kidneys that did not bleed at an SBP of 100 mm Hg 31% bled at 200 mm Hg.
CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variability among agents. Most were effective for small resections and some worked for medium resections but for large resections only sutured bolster was consistently effective. SBP also appears to be an important factor. These results bear on the selection of techniques during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16697864     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00282-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  A review of current hemostatic agents and tissue sealants used in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  I Galanakis; N Vasdev; N Soomro
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

Review 2.  A review of methods for hemostasis and renorrhaphy after laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Rajan Ramanathan; Raymond J Leveillee
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Current Status of Hemostatic Agents and Sealants in Urologic Surgical Practice.

Authors:  Sashi S Kommu; Robert McArthur; Amr M Emara; Utsav D Reddy; Christopher J Anderson; Neil J Barber; Raj A Persad; Christopher G Eden
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015

Review 4.  Use of cyanoacrylate adhesives in general surgery.

Authors:  David García Cerdá; Antonio Martín Ballester; Alicia Aliena-Valero; Anna Carabén-Redaño; José M Lloris
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Advancements in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: expanding the feasibility of nephron-sparing.

Authors:  Eugene J Pietzak; Thomas J Guzzo
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-09

6.  Hemostasis in laparoscopic renal surgery.

Authors:  Hussam A Hassouna; Ramaswamy Manikandan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-01

7.  Use of biological Glue (Bioglue®) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a study in pigs.

Authors:  Luis Felipe Brandão; Fabio Cesar Miranda Torricelli; Glauco Melo; Luiz Cesar Fernando Takano; Anuar Ibrahim Mitre; Marco Antonio Arap
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  The effect of biological sealants and adhesive treatments on matrix metalloproteinase expression during renal injury healing.

Authors:  José Miguel Lloris-Carsí; Carlos Barrios; Beatriz Prieto-Moure; José Miguel Lloris-Cejalvo; Dolores Cejalvo-Lapeña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.