Literature DB >> 16697406

Quantitative analysis of multi-component spherical virus assembly: scaffolding protein contributes to the global stability of phage P22 procapsids.

Kristin N Parent1, Adam Zlotnick, Carolyn M Teschke.   

Abstract

Assembly of the hundreds of subunits required to form an icosahedral virus must proceed with exquisite fidelity, and is a paradigm for the self-organization of complex macromolecular structures. However, the mechanism for capsid assembly is not completely understood for any virus. Here we have investigated the in vitro assembly of phage P22 procapsids using a quantitative model specifically developed to analyze assembly of spherical viruses. Phage P22 procapsids are the product of the co-assembly of 420 molecules of coat protein and approximately 100-300 molecules of scaffolding protein. Scaffolding protein serves as an assembly chaperone and is not part of the final mature capsid, but is essential for proper procapsid assembly. Here we show that scaffolding protein also affects the thermodynamics of assembly, and for the first time this quantitative analysis has been performed on a virus composed of more than one type of protein subunit. Purified coat and scaffolding proteins were mixed in varying ratios in vitro to form procapsids. The reactions were allowed to reach equilibrium and the proportion of the input protein assembled into procapsids or remaining as free subunits was determined by size exclusion chromatography and SDS-PAGE. The results were used to calculate the free energy contributions for individual coat and scaffolding proteins. Each coat protein subunit was found to contribute -7.2(+/-0.1)kcal/mol and each scaffolding protein -6.1(+/-0.2)kcal/mol to the stability of the procapsid. Because each protein interacts with two or more neighbors, the pair-wise energies are even less. The weak protein interactions observed in the assembly of procapsids are likely important in the control of nucleation, since an increase in affinity between coat and scaffolding proteins can lead to kinetic traps caused by the formation of too many nuclei. In addition, we find that adjusting the molar ratio of scaffolding to coat protein can alter the assembly product. When the scaffolding protein concentration is low relative to coat protein, there is a correspondingly low yield of proper procapsids. When the relative concentration is very high, too many nuclei form, leading to kinetically trapped assembly intermediates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16697406     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  26 in total

1.  Exploring the paths of (virus) assembly.

Authors:  Paul Moisant; Henry Neeman; Adam Zlotnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Understanding the concentration dependence of viral capsid assembly kinetics--the origin of the lag time and identifying the critical nucleus size.

Authors:  Michael F Hagan; Oren M Elrad
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Distinguishing reversible from irreversible virus capsid assembly.

Authors:  Adam Zlotnick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  In vitro screening for molecules that affect virus capsid assembly (and other protein association reactions).

Authors:  Adam Zlotnick; Angela Lee; Christina R Bourne; Jennifer M Johnson; Paul L Domanico; Stephen J Stray
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  GroEL/S substrate specificity based on substrate unfolding propensity.

Authors:  Kristin N Parent; Carolyn M Teschke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Incorporation of scaffolding protein gpO in bacteriophages P2 and P4.

Authors:  Jenny R Chang; Anton Poliakov; Peter E Prevelige; James A Mobley; Terje Dokland
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  Exploring the parameter space of complex self-assembly through virus capsid models.

Authors:  Blake Sweeney; Tiequan Zhang; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Unraveling the role of the C-terminal helix turn helix of the coat-binding domain of bacteriophage P22 scaffolding protein.

Authors:  G Pauline Padilla-Meier; Eddie B Gilcrease; Peter R Weigele; Juliana R Cortines; Molly Siegel; Justin C Leavitt; Carolyn M Teschke; Sherwood R Casjens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Surveying capsid assembly pathways through simulation-based data fitting.

Authors:  Lu Xie; Gregory R Smith; Xian Feng; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  The thermodynamics of virus capsid assembly.

Authors:  Sarah Katen; Adam Zlotnick
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.