Literature DB >> 16696788

Clinical performance of original and revised Bethesda guidelines for the identification of MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer: proposal of a new and simpler set of recommendations.

Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta1, Antoni Castells, Montserrat Andreu, Virgínia Piñol, Sergi Castellví-Bel, Cristina Alenda, Xavier Llor, Rosa M Xicola, Rodrigo Jover, Artemio Payá, Xavier Bessa, Francesc Balaguer, Joaquin Cubiella, Lidia Argüello, Juan Diego Morillas, Luis Bujanda.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Identification of individuals who should undergo hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) genetic testing is a critical and difficult issue. For this purpose, the National Cancer Institute outlined a set of recommendations, the Bethesda guidelines, which have recently been revised.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical performance of original and revised Bethesda guidelines for the detection of MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers in patients with colorectal cancer.
METHODS: A total of 1,222 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer were included in the EPICOLON study, a prospective, multicenter, nationwide epidemiology survey aimed at establishing the incidence of HNPCC in Spain (JAMA 2005; 293:1986-1994). Performance characteristics of the original and revised Bethesda guidelines were assessed with respect to the presence of MSH2/MLH1 germline mutations. Logistic regression analysis was performed to establish the most effective strategy.
RESULTS: Original or revised Bethesda guidelines were equivalent strategies in terms of sensitivity (100%vs 100%; ns), specificity (98.1%vs 97.9%; ns), and overall accuracy (98.1%vs 97.9%; ns), as well as positive (25.8%vs 24.2%) and negative predictive values (100%vs 100%). The most discriminating individual variables were criteria number 1 (i.e., fulfillment of the Amsterdam criteria; RR = 34.14; 95% CI = 6.85-170.16; p < 0.001) and number 2 (i.e., individuals with two HNPCC-related neoplasms; RR = 35.63; 95% CI = 4.83-262.6; p < 0.001) of the original guidelines, and criterion number 1 of the revised guidelines (i.e., colorectal cancer diagnosed under 50 yr of age; RR = 29.34; 95% CI = 3.81-225.96; p= 0.001). The aggregation of these three criteria was equivalent to both Bethesda guidelines in terms of sensitivity (100%) and negative predictive value (100%), but superior to the revised criteria regarding specificity (98.5%; p < 0.05), overall accuracy (98.5%; p < 0.05), and positive predictive value (30.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Original and revised Bethesda guidelines are equivalent, highly effective criteria for the identification of MSH2/MLH1 gene mutation carriers in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. A new set of recommendations, based on a combination of some of their individual criteria, may provide additional advantages in terms of effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16696788     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00522.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  19 in total

1.  The revised Bethesda guidelines: extent of utilization in a university hospital medical center with a cancer genetics program.

Authors:  Aparna Mukherjee; Thomas J McGarrity; Francesca Ruggiero; Walter Koltun; Kevin McKenna; Lisa Poritz; Maria J Baker
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.857

2.  Multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer enhances access to multimodal therapy and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.

Authors:  Rebecca A Levine; Bhani Chawla; Shelli Bergeron; Harry Wasvary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Bethesda criteria for microsatellite instability testing: impact on the detection of new cases of Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Miguel Serrano; Pedro Lage; Sara Belga; Bruno Filipe; Inês Francisco; Paula Rodrigues; Ricardo Fonseca; Paula Chaves; Isabel Claro; Cristina Albuquerque; António Dias Pereira
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Comparison of the clinical prediction model PREMM(1,2,6) and molecular testing for the systematic identification of Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Ewout W Steyerberg; Judith Balmaña; Rowena Mercado; Steven Gallinger; Robert Haile; Graham Casey; John L Hopper; Loic LeMarchand; Noralane M Lindor; Polly A Newcomb; Stephen N Thibodeau; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  T([20]) repeat in the 3'-untranslated region of the MT1X gene: a marker with high sensitivity and specificity to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Luca Morandi; Dario de Biase; Michela Visani; Adriana Monzoni; Annalisa Tosi; Mauro Brulatti; Daniela Turchetti; Paola Baccarini; Giovanni Tallini; Annalisa Pession
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Colorectal cancer prognosis twenty years later.

Authors:  Luis Bujanda; Cristina Sarasqueta; Elisabeth Hijona; Lander Hijona; Angel Cosme; Ines Gil; Jose Luis Elorza; Jose I Asensio; Santiago Larburu; José M Enríquez-Navascués; Rodrigo Jover; Francesc Balaguer; Xavier Llor; Xavier Bessa; Montserrat Andreu; Artemio Paya; Antoni Castells
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Molecular subtypes in early colorectal cancer associated with clinical features and patient prognosis.

Authors:  M Gil-Raga; E Jantus-Lewintre; S Gallach; V Giner-Bosch; A Frangi-Caregnato; M J Safont-Aguilera; J Garde-Noguera; E Zorraquino-Pina; M García-Martínez; C Camps-Herrero
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 8.  Clinical implications of microsatellite instability in sporadic colon cancers.

Authors:  Frank A Sinicrope; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.645

9.  Identification of Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Leticia Moreira; Francesc Balaguer; Noralane Lindor; Albert de la Chapelle; Heather Hampel; Lauri A Aaltonen; John L Hopper; Loic Le Marchand; Steven Gallinger; Polly A Newcomb; Robert Haile; Stephen N Thibodeau; Shanaka Gunawardena; Mark A Jenkins; Daniel D Buchanan; John D Potter; John A Baron; Dennis J Ahnen; Victor Moreno; Montserrat Andreu; Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Anil K Rustgi; Antoni Castells
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Comprehensive molecular analysis of mismatch repair gene defects in suspected Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) cases.

Authors:  James Mueller; Isabella Gazzoli; Prathap Bandipalliam; Judy E Garber; Sapna Syngal; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.