Literature DB >> 16696286

The volume-performance relationship in esophagectomy.

Andrew C Chang1, John D Birkmeyer.   

Abstract

The current literature demonstrates that both hospital volume and surgeon volume are inversely related to operative mortality for esophageal resection. Given the heterogeneity of the volume-outcome literature, it is difficult to identify minimum volume thresholds at which satisfactory performance is achieved. Both volume-based hospital referral and process improvement provide compelling and sometimes competing strategies for translating evidence about volume-outcome relationships into policy. Each approach has significant limitations that preclude uniform implementation nationwide but nonetheless should be a focus for continued investigation and application, with the goal of providing uniform and high-quality care after esophagectomy.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16696286     DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin            Impact factor:   1.750


  10 in total

1.  Is esophagectomy the paradigm for volume-outcome relationships?

Authors:  Brian E Louie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Effect of Surgeon Volume on Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcomes.

Authors:  Adam C Celio; Kevin R Kasten; Jason Brinkley; Ann Y Chung; Matthew B Burruss; Walter J Pories; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Early outcomes of surgery for oesophageal cancer in a thoracic regional unit. Can we maintain training without compromising results?

Authors:  Sumana D M Handagala; Emmanuel Addae-Boateng; David Beggs; John P Duffy; Antonio E Martin-Ucar
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Patient and peri-operative predictors of morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), 2005-2008.

Authors:  Birat Dhungel; Brian S Diggs; John G Hunter; Brett C Sheppard; John T Vetto; James P Dolan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The effect of age on the outcome of esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Abbas Alibakhshi; Ali Aminian; Rasoul Mirsharifi; Yosra Jahangiri; Habibollah Dashti; Faramarz Karimian
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.219

6.  Surgeon case volume and readmissions after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: more is less.

Authors:  Adam C Celio; Kevin R Kasten; Matthew B Burruss; Walter J Pories; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Transplant center volume and outcomes after liver retransplantation.

Authors:  P P Reese; H Yeh; A M Thomasson; J Shults; J F Markmann
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  The effect of volume on esophageal cancer resections: what constitutes acceptable resection volumes for centers of excellence?

Authors:  Robert A Meguid; Eric S Weiss; David C Chang; Malcolm V Brock; Steven C Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Surgery versus radical endotherapies for early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Cathy Bennett; Susi Green; John DeCaestecker; Max Almond; Hugh Barr; Pradeep Bhandari; Krish Ragunath; Rajvinder Singh; Janusz Jankowski
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-22

10.  Is surgery in the elderly for oesophageal cancer justifiable? Results from a single centre.

Authors:  A Mirza; S Pritchard; I Welch
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2013-09-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.