Literature DB >> 1669387

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less expensive than open cholecystectomy.

R E Anderson1, J G Hunter.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is emerging as the most attractive alternative to open cholecystectomy (OC) ever offered to patients. It combines a rapid recovery time with definitive therapy for their affliction. In addition to its greater acceptance by patients, LC has the potential to be more economical than OC because of the markedly shorter hospital stay required by most patients who have undergone LC. In this article we compare the hospital charges for patients undergoing LC with a matched group of patients undergoing OC. The hospital charge was $4,070 +/- 297 (mean +/- SEM) for patients undergoing LC and $5,017 +/- 497 for patients undergoing OC. This difference arises from the mean cost of in-patient care, which was $353 +/- 40 for LC patients and $1,335 +/- 138 for OC patients. LC appeared to be a bargain, both economically and physiologically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1669387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc        ISSN: 1051-7200


  7 in total

Review 1.  Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies.

Authors:  Alexander C Allori; I Michael Leitman; Elizabeth Heitman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Current dilemmas in management of common duct stones.

Authors:  A S Fink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The cost of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital.

Authors:  V W Vanek; C C Bourguet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is less expensive than open Belsey Mark IV.

Authors:  W S Laycock; M Oddsdottir; A Franco; K Mansour; J G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Using delta/DRG diagrams and decision tree analysis to select a cost-effective surgery for cholecystitis.

Authors:  D E Weiland; D M Caruso; A Kassir; R C Bay; J M Malone
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1997 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  A new modified layout for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A A Bakr
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Incremental net benefit of cholecystectomy compared with alternative treatments in people with gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies.

Authors:  Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; S Sajith Kumar; Meenakumari Natarajan; Akhil Sasidharan
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.