Literature DB >> 16691092

The attitudes to back pain scale in musculoskeletal practitioners (ABS-mp): the development and testing of a new questionnaire.

Tamar Pincus1, Steven Vogel, Rita Santos, Alan Breen, Nadine Foster, Martin Underwood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about practitioners' beliefs and attitudes to the treatment of low back pain, and whether these influence their clinical decisions, intervention strategies, and patient-centered outcomes. This study aimed to develop, test, and explore the underlying dimensions of a new questionnaire, the Attitudes to Back Pain Scale (ABS), in a specific group of clinicians, practitioners who specialize in musculoskeletal therapy.
METHODS: Items for the draft questionnaire were derived from interviews with practitioners (chiropractors, osteopaths, and physiotherapists). The draft questionnaire (52 items) sought to assess practitioners' attitudes concerning role and self-image plus their beliefs about treatment goals and prognosis of low back pain. The questionnaire was sent to a random selection of 300 practitioners from each professional group, and 546 (61%) responded. Split-sample analyses were performed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
RESULTS: Separate exploratory analyses were done for attitudes concerned with personal interaction (34 items) and attitudes about treatment orientation (18 items), producing six domains: limitations on sessions, psychologic, connection to health care system, confidence and concern, reactivation, and biomedical. Confirmatory analyses indicated that the model tested presented a good fit. Validity interviews revealed high agreement of categorization and low levels of difficulty in categorizing the items.
CONCLUSIONS: The internal structure of the new questionnaire not only shows excellent psychometric properties and good face validity, but also has the added advantage of being developed with a specific clinical context in mind. Additional evaluation is required to fully describe the psychometric integrity of this instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16691092     DOI: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000178223.85636.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  9 in total

1.  The relationship between patient and practitioner expectations and preferences and clinical outcomes in a trial of exercise and acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Elaine Thomas; Jonathan C Hill; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.931

2.  Returning back pain patients to work: how private musculoskeletal practitioners outside the national health service perceive their role (an interview study).

Authors:  Tamar Pincus; Alison Woodcock; Steven Vogel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

3.  Management of low back pain by physical therapists in quebec: how are we doing?

Authors:  Tamar Derghazarian; Maureen J Simmonds
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Individualised cognitive functional therapy compared with a combined exercise and pain education class for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mary O'Keeffe; Helen Purtill; Norelee Kennedy; Peter O'Sullivan; Wim Dankaerts; Aidan Tighe; Lars Allworthy; Louise Dolan; Norma Bargary; Kieran O'Sullivan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The development and exploratory analysis of the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ).

Authors:  Ben Darlow; Meredith Perry; Fiona Mathieson; James Stanley; Markus Melloh; Reginald Marsh; G David Baxter; Anthony Dowell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Non-specific mechanisms in orthodox and CAM management of low back pain (MOCAM): theoretical framework and protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katherine Bradbury; Miznah Al-Abbadey; Dawn Carnes; Borislav D Dimitrov; Susan Eardley; Carol Fawkes; Jo Foster; Maddy Greville-Harris; J Matthew Harvey; Janine Leach; George Lewith; Hugh MacPherson; Lisa Roberts; Laura Parry; Lucy Yardley; Felicity L Bishop
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Evaluation of training in guideline-oriented biopsychosocial management of low back pain in occupational health services: Protocol of a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Jaro Karppinen; Anna Sofia Simula; Riikka Holopainen; Mikko Lausmaa; Jouko Remes; Maija Paukkunen; Kasper Ussing; Neill Booth; Katja Ryynänen; Tomi Koski; Allan Abbott; Birgitta Öberg; Steven J Linton; Anne Smith; Peter O'Sullivan; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04

8.  Direct and mediated effects of treatment context on low back pain outcome: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Felicity Bishop; Miznah Al-Abbadey; Lisa Roberts; Hugh MacPherson; Beth Stuart; Dawn Carnes; Carol Fawkes; Lucy Yardley; Katherine Bradbury
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Changes in pain knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of osteopathy students after completing a clinically focused pain education module.

Authors:  Kylie Fitzgerald; Michael Fleischmann; Brett Vaughan; Kevin de Waal; Sarah Slater; John Harbis
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2018-10-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.