PURPOSE: To assess the influence of setup errors and organ motion in terms of the probability of tumor control and normal-tissue complications by tumor control probability and normal-tissue complication probability. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients were treated for prostate cancer with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Two orthogonal portal images were taken daily. All patients underwent three computed tomography scans during the 8-week treatment time (i.e., baseline, intermediate, and final). The original treatment plans were re-evaluated, taking into account setup errors and organ motion. RESULTS: The mean shifts +/- standard deviation of the whole patient population in the lateral, anterior-posterior, and craniocaudal direction were 1.0 +/- 1.5 mm, 0.9 +/- 2.1 mm, and 1.9 +/- 2.1 mm, respectively. In most of the recalculated dose-volume histograms, the coverage of clinical target volume was granted despite organ motion, whereas the rectal wall histograms were often very different from the planned ones. CONCLUSION: We have studied the impact of prostate and rectum motion, as well as setup errors, on dose-volume histograms. The estimate of these effects may have implications for predictive indications when planning intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments on prostate.
PURPOSE: To assess the influence of setup errors and organ motion in terms of the probability of tumor control and normal-tissue complications by tumor control probability and normal-tissue complication probability. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients were treated for prostate cancer with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Two orthogonal portal images were taken daily. All patients underwent three computed tomography scans during the 8-week treatment time (i.e., baseline, intermediate, and final). The original treatment plans were re-evaluated, taking into account setup errors and organ motion. RESULTS: The mean shifts +/- standard deviation of the whole patient population in the lateral, anterior-posterior, and craniocaudal direction were 1.0 +/- 1.5 mm, 0.9 +/- 2.1 mm, and 1.9 +/- 2.1 mm, respectively. In most of the recalculated dose-volume histograms, the coverage of clinical target volume was granted despite organ motion, whereas the rectal wall histograms were often very different from the planned ones. CONCLUSION: We have studied the impact of prostate and rectum motion, as well as setup errors, on dose-volume histograms. The estimate of these effects may have implications for predictive indications when planning intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments on prostate.
Authors: David Klein; Tina Marie Briere; Rajat Kudchadker; Louis Archambault; Luc Beaulieu; Andrew Lee; Sam Beddar Journal: Radiat Meas Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 1.898
Authors: Maria Grazia Petrongari; Valeria Landoni; Biancamaria Saracino; Sara Gomellini; Stefano Arcangeli; Giuseppe Iaccarino; Paola Pinnarò; Giorgio Arcangeli; Lidia Strigari Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-12-13
Authors: Simona Marzi; Biancamaria Saracino; Maria G Petrongari; Stefano Arcangeli; Sara Gomellini; Giorgio Arcangeli; Marcello Benassi; Valeria Landoni Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-08-19
Authors: Stephen F Kry; Michael Price; Zhonglu Wang; Firas Mourtada; Mohammad Salehpour Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 2.102