Literature DB >> 16690098

Perceptual learning with spatial uncertainties.

Thomas U Otto1, Michael H Herzog, Manfred Fahle, Li Zhaoping.   

Abstract

In perceptual learning, stimuli are usually assumed to be presented to a constant retinal location during training. However, due to tremor, drift, and microsaccades of the eyes, the same stimulus covers different retinal positions on sequential trials. Because of these variations the mathematical decision problem changes from linear to non-linear (). This non-linearity implies three predictions. First, varying the spatial position of a stimulus within a moderate range does not deteriorate perceptual learning. Second, improvement for one stimulus variant can yield negative transfer to other variants. Third, interleaved training with two stimulus variants yields no or strongly diminished learning. Using a bisection task, we found psychophysical evidence for the first and last prediction. However, no negative transfer was found as opposed to the second prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16690098     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

1.  Broad-based visual benefits from training with an integrated perceptual-learning video game.

Authors:  Jenni Deveau; Gary Lovcik; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Tactile perceptual learning: learning curves and transfer to the contralateral finger.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Vincent van de Ven; Joel Reithler; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interference and feature specificity in visual perceptual learning.

Authors:  Yuko Yotsumoto; Li-Hung Chang; Takeo Watanabe; Yuka Sasaki
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Hebbian Reweighting on Stable Representations in Perceptual Learning.

Authors:  Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Learn Percept       Date:  2009-06-01

5.  Does perceptual learning suffer from retrograde interference?

Authors:  Kristoffer C Aberg; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Perceptual learning: functions, mechanisms, and applications.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; Cong Yu; Takeo Watanabe; Dov Sagi; Dennis Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Retrograde interference in perceptual learning of a peripheral hyperacuity task.

Authors:  Shao-Chin Hung; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Adaptive gain modulation in V1 explains contextual modifications during bisection learning.

Authors:  Roland Schäfer; Eleni Vasilaki; Walter Senn
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Stimulus coding rules for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Jun-Yun Zhang; Shu-Guang Kuai; Lu-Qi Xiao; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi; Cong Yu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Perceptual learning via modification of cortical top-down signals.

Authors:  Roland Schäfer; Eleni Vasilaki; Walter Senn
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.